Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm vs ISC bind versions

2012-07-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-07-15 04:49, Paul Wouters skrev: I started with the .spec file from EL6, removed all but two patches, and now have a 9.9.1-P1 source rpm that will build on EL4, EL5, EL6. Why not just grab the Fedora srpm and recompile on rhel6? have redhat/fedora stopped accepting bugreports ?, ol

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm vs ISC bind versions

2012-07-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-07-15 07:42, Carl Byington skrev: c) we want to be able to trivially upgrade to 9.9.1-P2 or 9.9.2 or whatever ISC releases. you choiced prebuildt binaries with all that problems it gives d) we want our binary to have the same source line numbers as the ISC source code, so that crash

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm vs ISC bind versions

2012-07-15 Thread Eivind Olsen
Den 15. juli 2012 kl. 16:57 skrev Benny Pedersen : > change to gentoo/funtoo ? Some might prefer to run the same Linux distribution on all their servers, changing to something like Gentoo just to get BIND running seems a bit overkill. Regards Eivind Olsen __

Weird stuff with one host... :-S

2012-07-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hi guys, I am puzzeling arround what happen to my intranet NS, because if I do on my workstation --[ command 'dig +all samba.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net' ] ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> +all samba.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm vs ISC bind versions

2012-07-15 Thread Drunkard Zhang
2012/7/16 Eivind Olsen : > Den 15. juli 2012 kl. 16:57 skrev Benny Pedersen : > >> change to gentoo/funtoo ? > > Some might prefer to run the same Linux distribution on all their servers, > changing to something like Gentoo just to get BIND running seems a bit > overkill. > For critical services,

Re: Weird stuff with one host... :-S

2012-07-15 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Michelle Konzack wrote: > ANY hosts are working from any workstations/servers except > on . Views? -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-

Re: recursive-clients recommended values

2012-07-15 Thread blrmaani
I On Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:49:27 AM UTC-7, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On 12 Jul 2012, at 03:21, blrmaani wrote: > > > I searched earlier posts but noticed that people are recommending it to > just increase it to suppress the errors in log. > > > > Any pointers on this? > > If it's set