Re: Interaction of -S and recursive-clients?

2012-05-18 Thread Chris Thompson
On May 17 2012, Daniel Deighton wrote: On 05/17/2012 12:20 PM, Chris Thompson wrote: [... snip ...] named: general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds limit (4096/4096) last message repeated 1194 times named: general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds limit (4096/4096) last message re

bind multiple instances

2012-05-18 Thread Amira Othman
Hi all I am using bind 9 on centos 5.8 and I want to configure second instance on bind with another ip. Is that possible with bind and how can I do that? Regards ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from th

Re: bind multiple instances

2012-05-18 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , "Amira Othman" wrote: > Hi all > I am using bind 9 on centos 5.8 and I want to configure second instance on > bind with another ip. Is that possible with bind and how can I do that? Give them each their own named.conf file, and it would probably be best for them to have different

Re: bind multiple instances

2012-05-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > "Amira Othman" wrote: > > I am using bind 9 on centos 5.8 and I want to configure second > > instance on bind with another ip. Is that possible with bind and > > how can I do that? > > Give them each their own nam

Reverse zone delegation for 172.16.16.0/20 - HOW TO?

2012-05-18 Thread Ellad G. Yatsko
Hello! There is the Supernet 172.16.0.0/12 is distributed through my network. Some network hierarchy is built in this Supernet. Some addressing plan is used. There are some towns. Each town has IP pool of 172.16.0.0/16...172.30.0.0/16. There are some sites in different districts of above t

Re: bind multiple instances

2012-05-18 Thread Scott Bertilson
In our case, our on-campus public recursive servers run 2 instances, one for local applications only and the other for the public. We implemented it almost exactly as you describe and it works great. Scott On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > "Amira Othman"

Re: Reverse zone delegation for 172.16.16.0/20 - HOW TO?

2012-05-18 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , "Ellad G. Yatsko" wrote: > Hello! > > There is the Supernet 172.16.0.0/12 is distributed through my network. > Some network hierarchy is built in this Supernet. Some addressing plan > is used. > > There are some towns. Each town has IP pool of > 172.16.0.0/16...172.30.0.0/16. >