nsupdate fails on CNAME but A and PTR goes through

2012-05-17 Thread lejeczek
hi everybody when I do: > server 127.0.0.1 > zone ccnr.biotechnology. > update add second 86400 in cname first > send update failed: NOTZONE in log I get: May 17 11:59:10 whale named[2910]: debug level is now 5 May 17 12:00:28 whale named[2910]: client 127.0.0.1#33465: view biotech: signer "

Re: nsupdate fails on CNAME but A and PTR goes through

2012-05-17 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> > server 127.0.0.1 > > zone ccnr.biotechnology. > > update add second 86400 in cname first > > send > update failed: NOTZONE Have you tried specifying qualified names? update add second.ccnr.biotechnology. 86400 in cname first.ccnr.biotechnology. -JP __

Re: nsupdate fails on CNAME but A and PTR goes through

2012-05-17 Thread lejeczek
sort of a false alarm nsupdate with FQDN(dot) did work!(???) On 17/05/12 12:03, lejeczek wrote: hi everybody when I do: > server 127.0.0.1 > zone ccnr.biotechnology. > update add second 86400 in cname first > send update failed: NOTZONE in log I get: May 17 11:59:10 whale named[2910]: debug

Interaction of -S and recursive-clients?

2012-05-17 Thread Chris Thompson
Our local university-wide recursive nameservers have options { /* ... */ recursive-clients 5000; } This is meant to be reached only at very bad times indeed. During a recent network partition incident, I noticed that named logged named: general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds limit

dlz_dlopen plug-in for ENUM from LDAP

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
I've recently released a dlz ENUM module for the bind9 nameserver: http://www.opentelecoms.org/dlz-ldap-enum Basically, it handles ENUM queries from repro, FreeSWITCH, Kamailio, Asterisk, Lumicall, etc, searches for the phone number in LDAP, and if found, returns the email address as both a S

Re: Interaction of -S and recursive-clients?

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel Deighton
On 05/17/2012 12:20 PM, Chris Thompson wrote: > Our local university-wide recursive nameservers have > > options { /* ... */ > recursive-clients 5000; > } > > This is meant to be reached only at very bad times indeed. During a recent > network partition incident, I noticed that named logged