On 06.02.12 23:09, sasa sasa wrote:
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one
cache only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
instances of BIND on the same OS?
According to what I've heard, virtualization
Zitat von sasa sasa :
Hi,
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS,
one cache only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
instances of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the best practice
to take advantage o
On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that
>should not affect functionality.
Wouldn't this have mixed (one) caches?
>I suppose you are running 64bit OS, so you can have really huge cache (>4GB)
Yes, it's 64bit.
__
On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that should
not affect functionality.
On 07.02.12 04:02, sasa sasa wrote:
Wouldn't this have mixed (one) caches?
No, unless you use attach-cache directive.
However, the ca
In message <1328616138.50948.yahoomail...@web120103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, sasa
sasa writes:
> On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that
> >should not affect functionality.
>
> Wouldn't this have mixed (one) cac
Virtualization doesn't reduce use of resources but DOES separate into what are
perceived to be multiple "servers" so I'm not sure what you mean by "you still
have one server".
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jl
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:09 -0800, sasa sasa wrote:
> Hi,
> I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one cache
> only and another authoritative.
> Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
> instances of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 03:17:45PM +0800, Jeff Peng wrote:
> δΊ 2012-2-7 15:09, sasa sasa ει:
> >I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on
> >CentOS, one cache only and another authoritative.
> >Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them
> >or run 2 instances of BI
Hi everybody,
sorry for my post i'm not read to bring a light to the 1st problem but to
find help.
I'm triying to sign a zone on Bind 9.8-P1 but i have this message:
*dnssec-signzone: fatal: key myKSK.key not at origin*
I just want help if someone has been confronted with this kind of message
i'
William Thierry SAMEN wrote:
>
> I'm triying to sign a zone on Bind 9.8-P1 but i have this message:
>
> *dnssec-signzone: fatal: key myKSK.key not at origin*
It means the zone name in the key is not the same as the zone you are
signing.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Rockall, Ma
> dnssec-signzone: fatal: key myKSK.key not at origin
What are the contents of myKSK.key?
The format is "mydomain.com. IN DNSKEY ..." where mydomain.com is the domain
origin.
Jeffry A. Spain
Network Administrator
Cincinnati Country Day School
___
Plea
I'm not sure why this answer has gone off into the weeds, but running 2
instances on the same host is quite simple.
1. Get 2 different (hopefully sets of v4 and v6) IP addresses, one for
each instance.
2. Set up 2 different chroot environments, one for the authoritative and
one for the resolver. I
PLEASE READ: An important security announcement from ISC
ISC has been notified by Haixin Duan (a professor at Tsinghua
University in Beijing China, who is currently visiting the
International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) at the University
of California, Berkeley) about a DNS resolve
13 matches
Mail list logo
