Re: Trying to do reverse lookups, but crashing named instead.

2012-01-23 Thread Adam Tkac
On 01/19/2012 09:18 PM, Stack Kororā wrote: Hello, The dhcpd mailinglist sent me your way with a problem I am having with named/dhcpd. The problem I have is that I can not seem to get reverse hostname lookups in my PXEboot, which means my PXEboot clients think they are localhost. The problem t

Recursive queries not working

2012-01-23 Thread Steven Vona
I am posting here as a last resort and hope someone can help me. I am running RHEL6 and installed bind-chroot package. I have tried everything, and even posted to a linux forum I belong to for help. After three pages and a boat load of troubleshooting no resolution. Here is a link to the 3 page

Re: Recursive queries not working

2012-01-23 Thread Ezra Taylor
Steve: Shouldn't you specify who is allowed to perform recursive quries? Your pretty wide open. On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Steven Vona wrote: > I am posting here as a last resort and hope someone can help me. > > I am running RHEL6 and installed bind-chroot package. I have t

Re: Recursive queries not working

2012-01-23 Thread Ezra Taylor
Steve: Shouldn't you specify who is allowed to perform recursive quri On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Steven Vona wrote: > I am posting here as a last resort and hope someone can help me. > > I am running RHEL6 and installed bind-chroot package. I have tried > everything, and even

Re: Recursive queries not working

2012-01-23 Thread Ezra Taylor
Steve: I should have stated this first. Remove bind from chroot and then try to do a recursive query. If it works, then you know you have a problem with chroot. On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Ezra Taylor wrote: > Steve: > Shouldn't you specify who is allowed to per

Re: Recursive queries not working

2012-01-23 Thread Kevin Darcy
Offhand, it looks like you might have DNSSEC validation turned on (thus making responses from the GTLD nameservers bigger than 512 bytes; note that all of the GTLD-server responses in that tcpdump have truncation flagged), your EDNS0 buffer tuned down to 512 bytes ("edns-udp-size 512", thus eli

IPv6 Nameserver Question with dig +trace

2012-01-23 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Hi All, On an older Bind server such as 9.3.6-p1, I can run dig +trace www.pccc.com. However, when I'm using 9.8.1-p1 and seeing a problem that stops the trace when it reaches our IPv6 nameserver, ns3.pccc.com. Examples follow. Am I doing something wrong with the newer dig? Regards, KAM di

Re: IPv6 Nameserver Question with dig +trace

2012-01-23 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:02 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Hi All, > > On an older Bind server such as 9.3.6-p1, I can run dig +trace www.pccc.com. > > However, when I'm using 9.8.1-p1 and seeing a problem that stops the > trace when it reaches our IPv6 nameserver, ns3.pccc.com. Examples fol

Re: IPv6 Nameserver Question with dig +trace

2012-01-23 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 1/23/2012 11:54 PM, Noel Butler wrote: Likely because ns3 has only ipv6 address and no ipv4 address and the server you are checking from has no ipv6 capability. You are asking for big problems using this method. You should give all NS records an IPv4 address, and then add in IPv6 on the on

Re: IPv6 Nameserver Question with dig +trace

2012-01-23 Thread Mark Andrews
It's a known bug. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list b

Re: IPv6 Nameserver Question with dig +trace

2012-01-23 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 1/24/2012 12:12 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: It's a known bug. Thanks for the update. If you need a tester for a patch, just let me know. Best, KAM ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind