On 09.12.2011 22:54, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
This is not the answer I am looking. If the parameter exists, it's must
working.
Have you tried issuing the command from a command prompt?
Yes, as I wrote, from the command line the "-c" option is invoked and
the bind is loading the indicated file.
__
During a bout of excessive boredom I created a Lua back-end for DLZ's
dlopen() driver. If anybody is interested, I've put up a short
description [1] and the source code [2]. Patches are welcome. :)
-JP
[1] http://jpmens.net/2011/12/01/lua-back-end-for-bind/
[2] https://github.com/jpmens/d
Hello, I'm running FreeBSD and I intend to install the lastest BIND
with LDAP support; my confusion is what is the difference between BIND
built with the DLZ LDAP driver and BIND built with the 'sdb'
(simplified database interface) as built in the dns/bind97-sdb port?
If these are two different wa
Hi,
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime.
Any idea? Thanks.
Regards.
_
> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
> is almost dead.
> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime.
Are these your authoritative or your recursive name servers? These are
2011/12/10 :
>> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
>> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
>> is almost dead.
>> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host
>> sometime.
>
> Are these your authoritative or your recursiv
> >> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
> >> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
> >> is almost dead.
> >> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host
> >> sometime.
> >
> > Are these your authoritative or your recursiv
In message
, =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes:
> 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff :
> > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME?
> >
>
> Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC.
>
> quote:
> Never one to let a RFC stand in the way of a solution to a real
> prob
Hi,
using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386
Having a problem with views. My intended configuration:
* most zones are identical in either view
* a few zones are added in the internal view
* networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know,
i'm not supposed to mix authoritative
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message
>
> , =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes:
> > 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff :
> > > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME?
> > >
> >
> > Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC.
> >
> > quote:
> > Never one to
2011/12/11 Barry Margolin :
>
> If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never
> see the CNAME record. Instead, when the auth server receives the query
> for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME,
> and returns the result of this.
>
That hears
2011/12/11 Dan Pritts :
> Hi,
>
> using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386
>
> Having a problem with views. My intended configuration:
>
> * most zones are identical in either view
>
> * a few zones are added in the internal view
>
> * networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know,
In message , Barry Mar
golin writes:
> In article ,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > In message
> >
> > , =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes:
> > > 2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff :
> > > > Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Some nameservers can setup that, th
In article ,
Ken Peng wrote:
> 2011/12/11 Barry Margolin :
>
> >
> > If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never
> > see the CNAME record. Â Instead, when the auth server receives the query
> > for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME,
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo