Hi,
I'm running three DNS servers (1 master, 2 slaves) running bind 9.7.3,
hosting about 150 domains, while also providing DNS service for my network.
Recently a customer complained that they cannot send an email (they use
my SMTP server) to a specific domain 'rabobank.com' - Postfix logged
On 26.07.2011 00:48, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Correct. That's the distinction which is typically made between a
DNS *forwarder* (which caches) and a DNS *proxy* (which doesn't).
As far as I know, BIND cannot be configured to be a DNS proxy.
On 26.07.11 11:11, Vbvbrj wrote:
But I don't want BIND as
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:59:32AM +0200,
Danilo Godec wrote
a message of 247 lines which said:
> Weirdness number 2 - using dig directly with their servers works:
Nothing weird here: dig does not behave like the BIND resolver. It
does not use EDNS at all by default, it does not use the same
On 07/27/2011 10:31 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:59:32AM +0200,
Danilo Godec wrote
a message of 247 lines which said:
Weirdness number 2 - using dig directly with their servers works:
Nothing weird here: dig does not behave like the BIND resolver. It
does not
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31:30AM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote
a message of 34 lines which said:
> 1) It means you are vulnerable to Kaminsky-style cache poisoning. In
> 2011, 'query-source port 53;' should have disappeared a long time
> ago.
For the record, there are still around 1 % of
In message <4e2fea67.7080...@agenda.si>, Danilo Godec writes:
> On 07/27/2011 10:31 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:59:32AM +0200,
> > Danilo Godec wrote
> > a message of 247 lines which said:
> >
> >> Weirdness number 2 - using dig directly with their servers wo
On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:51 PM, Feng He wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Chris Buxton
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Feng He wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:55 AM, ju wusuo wrote:
Would like to use the BIND stub zone function, however, heard that ISC
con
On 07/26/11 07:23, Paul Reilly wrote:
Is there a simple utility, which can ICMP ping or HTTP ping a host, and
update the hosts DNS entry if the host is down?
Will a significant number of your users have locally cached the
out-of-date entry?
--
Gloria Rom
UCLA Library Information Technology
g
These two views are identical in any way I can see, so the fault may be
in an included configuration file that is not included in your message.
Look for allow-query, allow-recursion or allow-cache statements in your
other config files.
When using views, I often find it more manageable to move
In message <4e307a5c.9070...@library.ucla.edu>, Gloria Rom writes:
> On 07/26/11 07:23, Paul Reilly wrote:
> > Is there a simple utility, which can ICMP ping or HTTP ping a host, and
> > update the hosts DNS entry if the host is down?
Ping + nsupdate can do this. Note if you applications are pro
10 matches
Mail list logo
