On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:41:50PM -0800,
Jeff Peng wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> I changed ns[1-2].myzone.com to new IPs in myzone.com's DNS, then
> how to let BIND for example.com to know the NS has been changed?
Wait for the TTL to expire seems the most reasonable course of act
I remember there is a rndc option, but not sure.
> -Original Message-
> From: bortzme...@nic.fr
> Sent: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:06:54 +0200
> To: pen...@inbox.com
> Subject: Re: tell BIND the nameservers have been changed
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:41:50PM -0800,
> Jeff Peng wrote
> a
> I changed ns[1-2].myzone.com to new IPs in myzone.com's DNS, then how to
> let BIND for example.com to know the NS has been changed?
Since you have decided to not use the real names I can't give specific
advice.
I do wonder if you might have forgotten to also update the glue records;
if ns[1-2]
Good morning.
We sent the following email to the dns managers at thehartford.com this morning:
-
Hi. We’re experiencing some issues with address record lookups for
eftc.thehartford.com. We’ve got a coupl
On 6/15/2011 8:28 AM, M. Meadows wrote:
> Question : why does eftc as an address record in the thehartford.com
> zone file have a 30 second TTL? Seems … very … short. I think most
> nameservers won’t do less than a minute for an address record. Right?
No. There is no problem with a short TTL.
>
Thanks.
In this situation:
- KSK signed ZSK(DNSKEY RR).
- ZSK signing others RR of zone.
I don't see reason for the KSK be present in operations unless
add/delete RR DNSKEY.
I think this error message it's a bug:
dns_dnssec_findzonekeys2: error reading private key file
my.zone.com/NSEC3RSASH
Info at the authoritative servers doesn't match the glue records.
We see this all the time on our recursive resolvers.
rich-goodsons-computer:~ rgoodson$ dig +norec @ns1.thehartford.com
thehartford.com NS
; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> +norec @ns1.thehartford.com thehartford.com NS
; (1 server
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:38AM -0300, Noel Rocha wrote:
Thanks.
In this situation:
- KSK signed ZSK(DNSKEY RR).
- ZSK signing others RR of zone.
I don't see reason for the KSK be present in operations unless
add/delete RR DNSKEY.
Signature expiration.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, M. Meadows wrote:
Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and
ns2.thehartford.com are
the authoritative nameservers for thehartford.com. A dig with a +trace for
eftc.thehartford.com seems to indicate that they are indeed the auth
nameservers. It?
On 6/12/2011 4:00 PM, Rodrigo Faria Tavares wrote:
Hello,
I installed bind in CentOS release 5.6 (Final).
My DNS Server not ping alias (with cname), so the steps:
I installed this packages:
[root@centos ~]# rpm -qa | grep bind
ypbind-1.19-12.el5
bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5
bind-chroot-9.3.6-16.P
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the quick feedback!
We appreciate your assistance on this.
Marty
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:25:00 -0700
> From: mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu
> To: sun-g...@live.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: question about thehartford.com domai
Hello all,
I plan to replace bind8 with bind9 on a same hardware (just software upgrade).
- Has anyone faced a performance problem due to an upgrade bind8/bind9?
- Is bind9 less performant or do I have to be confident on this aspect?
Thanks in advance for any feedback,
Hugo,
hugo hugoo wrote:
> - Has anyone faced a performance problem due to an upgrade bind8/bind9?
I didn't notice anything like that when I last upgraded from BIND8 (back
in 2001 or so).
When that is said: what kind of hardware are you running it on? Single
CPU? Multiple cores? I've seen some fairly a
What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any difference
between the two ?
Thanks & Regards
-Original Message-
From: Eivind Olsen
Sender: bind-users-bounces+abushlaibi=ies.etisalat...@lists.isc.org
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:30:58
To:
Subject: Re: bind 9 performance
On 6/15/2011 4:06 PM, abushla...@ies.etisalat.ae wrote:
What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any difference
between the two ?
Thanks& Regards
-Original Message-
From: Eivind Olsen
Sender: bind-users-bounces+abushlaibi=ies.etisalat...@lists.isc.org
Date: Wed, 15
abushla...@ies.etisalat.ae wrote:
> What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any
> difference between the two ?
Do you mean the zone configuration in named.conf, or the zonefiles?
BIND9 has a doc/misc/migration document which gives plenty of good advice
on configuration chang
I do not change the zone files.
I only remove some logging category nt compatible with bind9, that's all.
I agree that I have to go to BIND9.
My question was related to the fact that I am a little worry about a difference
in performance when I will be in BIND9.
So I wonder if I do not have to
hugo hugoo wrote:
> Is there anything I have to look at to check that all is OK in terms of
> performances when I will be in BIND9?
Well, you haven't really given any information about your current setup
and usage, so I have no idea if you're trying to run a million-user ISP
with DNS on an old In
One of the things that got us is we didn't know BIND 8 automatically created
delegation records in a zone at the zone cut, if the nameserver knew of the
existence of the cut.
For example, if we have the following zones in our named.conf:
zone "example.com" { ... };
zone "sub.example.com" {
The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver mismatch is
working as expected. Here's some of the feedback we received from them when we
questioned the setup:
~We use load balancers for
the majority of our internet facing URLs. We have multiple datac
20 matches
Mail list logo
