Re: Compromised BIND?

2011-06-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:59:08PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote a message of 52 lines which said: > Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Same problem for me. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently >> sorted, correct? On 31.05.11 12:27, Phil Mayers wrote: > Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply with RFC > 3484 policies in calls to getaddri

[OT] Re: Compromised BIND?

2011-06-01 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Stephane Bortzmeyer : On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:59:08PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote a message of 52 lines which said: Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Same problem for me. No wonder the list is slow if everyone send a confirmation that it is slow ;-)

Slow list [was: Re: Compromised BIND?]

2011-06-01 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Yes, very. [Pressing 's'end at 09:54 CET] -JP ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Maren S. Leizaola
On 5/31/2011 7:39 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: It is still a bad idea. Fixing the clients so they work well with multi-homed servers not only works today with mostly IPv4 servers but also works well with dual stack server and IPv6 only servers. You don't have to have artifially low TTLs on the DNS r

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Phil Mayers
On 01/06/11 08:11, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently sorted, correct? On 31.05.11 12:27, Phil Mayers wrote: Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply wit

Re: Slow list [was: Re: Compromised BIND?]

2011-06-01 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > > Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? > > Yes, very. [Pressing 's'end at 09:54 CET] I think it's moderated. Sending at 11:16 UTC. -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "no

Re: Slow list

2011-06-01 Thread Alan Clegg
On 6/1/2011 7:16 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >>> Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? >> >> Yes, very. [Pressing 's'end at 09:54 CET] > > I think it's moderated. Sending at 11:16 UTC. It's not moderated. I'll have op

Radomir Kuznetsov is out of the office.

2011-06-01 Thread rkuznets
I will be out of the office starting 05/26/2011 and will not return until 06/13/2011. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users