Hello,
I set up gss-tsig and working fine with bind 9.7.3 and bind 9.8. Now I tried
it on a 2nd server that uses 2 instances of bind. One for primary one for
secondary. For this the primary bind starts with the "-t parameter" which
tells him to use a change root enviroment. If I start the bind thi
Hey Juergen,
You could try running bind with -g option and see what the logs tell you.
Best Regards
On 13/04/2011 1:11 PM, Juergen Dietl wrote:
Hello,
I set up gss-tsig and working fine with bind 9.7.3 and bind 9.8. Now I
tried it on a 2nd server that uses 2 instances of bind. One for
pri
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juergen Dietl
Date: 2011/4/13
Subject: Re: GSS-TSIG with a change root enviroment
To: Abdulla Bushlaibi
Hello,
thanx for the -g hint. Now I see the same thing I saw yesterday in the
syslog. For any reason the syslog dont show anything since yesterd
Trying to get a clean set of logs.
I'm guessing this has something to do with redefining
'view _default' and I'm having challenges figuring out
how to do this.
Someone point me to where _default is defined in the
docs and I'll just remove appropriate references to
the mentioned files.
Thanks.
Hello.
if I query my domain zone with dig I have correct values as response.
dig mydomain.com SOA
now if I query one of my subdomains
dig subodmain.mydomain.com SOA
in the response I have a
ANSWER SECTION and AUTHORITY SECTION.
but I do not have an ADDICTIONAL SECTION and I did not expect i
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2011, at 10:49, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
>> Thanks Walter and Marco. Those two tool/method do resolve short term
>> needs. Thanks again.
>> (btw, the URL form Walter should be
>> ftp://ftp.bieringer.de/pub/linux/IPv6/ipv6calc/ )
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Niall O'Reilly
wrote:
On 12 Apr 2011, at 10:49, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
Thanks Walter and Marco. Those two tool/method do resolve short term
needs. Thanks again.
(btw, the URL form Walter should be
Hello List,
When troubleshooting a particular reverse delegated zone to us we used
the normal "d/26.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa" naming for the zone. A couple of
zones did not get served correctly (tried on BIND 9.7.0-P2 and 9.7.3)
and any query for a record within these zones always came back with a
SERVF
On 4/13/2011 6:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
> Not sure how large will be the effort to add a new directive into
> BIND, but that just a feed back, and wish, from me and my team
> members, who needs to maintain few hundreds of statically assigned IPs
> for servers and CE/PE routers.
Dynamic
Hello
I'm setting up a DDSN server , following the ISC documentation
it is working nicely.
But I would like some guidance on setting up the TTL value
for DHCP/DDNS clients.
We use a lot of dual boot machines WINDOWS/LINUX and
with default parameters the DDNS record isn't removed
from the DDNS w
10 matches
Mail list logo
