- Original Message
> From: Mark Andrews
> To: Fr34k
> Cc: Bindlist
> Sent: Wed, March 23, 2011 9:04:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Q on clients-per-query, max-clients-per-query
>
>
> In message <>, Fr34k writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > # The ARM says: #
> > clients-per-query, max-clients-per-que
>
> So, does BIND behave the same whether it is a single PC making 100 queries
> for
> the same record compared to 555 PCs making queries for the same record?
> That is, how does BIND treat "clients-per-query, max-clients-per-query"
> differently based upon the query requesters' IP address(es)
hi bind //guru/
hi isc guru
hi mark andrews
hi michel graff
despite my efforts to validate isc dlv. I'm always at the same point I
can not validate the keys. error below the script isc
SUCCESS 94.23.59.30 answered DNSKEY query with rcode NOERROR
3.345:SUCCESS 87.98.186.232 answered DNSKEY query
In message <688460.82562...@web121414.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, Fr34k writes:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Mark Andrews
> > To: Fr34k
> > Cc: Bindlist
> > Sent: Wed, March 23, 2011 9:04:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Q on clients-per-query, max-clients-per-query
> >
> >
> > In message <>, F
In message <1300993213.12273.96.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @" write
s:
> hi bind //guru/
> hi isc guru
> hi mark andrews
> hi michel graff
There are no DLV records for fakessh.eu. See below.
There are no DS records for fakessh.eu. See below.
Two of the nameservers for your zone a
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a écrit :
> In message <1300993213.12273.96.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"
> write
> s:
> > hi bind //guru/
> > hi isc guru
> > hi mark andrews
> > hi michel graff
>
> There are no DLV records for fakessh.eu. See below.
>
> There
In message <1301004136.12273.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"
writes:
> Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 =C3=A0 08:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a =C3=A9crit :
> > In message <1300993213.12273.96.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"=
> write
> > s:
> > > hi bind //guru/
> > > hi isc guru
> >
> necessarily because I can not validate the key through via isc dlv
Your zone isn't fully DNSSEC-capable yet; fix that first, then you can
submit a DLV record into dlv.isc.org.
ns0.xname.org and ns2.xname.org are giving bad answers; remove them from
your NS RRset and things should start working
everything worked just fine until I change the key rdnc. ns in my side
and only ns1.novacrea.fr ns1.xname.org are valid for dnssec
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 23:02 +0100, fakessh @ a écrit :
> Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a écrit :
> > In message <1300993213.12273.96.camel@lo
the DS it is necessary that I contact OVH.
in the DLV conserne my problem I have this same recurring errors in the
script of the isc
that's my problem
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 09:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a écrit :
> In message <1301004136.12273.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"
> wr
it is 6 months since I used no worries dlv
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 23:21 +0100, fakessh @ a écrit :
> everything worked just fine until I change the key rdnc. ns in my side
> and only ns1.novacrea.fr ns1.xname.org are valid for dnssec
>
>
> Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 23:02 +0100, fakessh @ a écrit
Fakessh wrote:
> the DS it is necessary that I contact OVH.
> in the DLV conserne my problem I have this same recurring errors in the
> script of the isc
> that's my problem
I'll admit, I've had some problems guessing what the problem you're
experiencing really is, there's been mentions of TSIG k
In message <1301008426.12273.115.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"
writes:
> it is 6 months since I used no worries dlv
What keys do you have recorded with dlv.isc.org?
Do they match what you currently have in the zone?
Click on ManageZones
Click on (details)
Under More click on (detail
I did click Click ManageZones
Click on (details)
Click under More (more)
performance test
the total result is
http://pastebin.com/1bAYHj0d
i mail hostmaster of ns1.novacrea.fr
is a friend
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 10:38 +1100, Mark Andrews a écrit :
> In message <1301008426.12273.115.camel
http://secspider.cs.ucla.edu/fakessh-eu--dnskey.txt
this page indicate a DSA algorhtyme
it's my old algorthyme
new is RSA
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 01:25 +0100, fakessh @ a écrit :
> I did click Click ManageZones
> Click on (details)
> Click under More (more)
> performance test
>
>
>
> the t
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 09:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a écrit :
> In message <1301004136.12273.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "fakessh @"
> writes:
> > Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 =C3=A0 08:24 +1100, Mark Andrews a =C3=A9crit :
> > > In message <1300993213.12273.96.camel@localhost.localdomain>, "f
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:57:26PM +0100, fakessh @ wrote:
> hi guru
>
> I'm walking on the same server rndc and named
Then all I can suggest is generating a new key. What puzzles me is that
I don't see a way to see or adjust dates on the generated keys.
--
/**
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09:06PM +0100, fakessh @ wrote:
>
>
> I can wait how long before this ends?
...
> > Are you running 'rndc' from the same server on which the 'named' is
> > running? If not, make sure that both have the same time.
...
I don't understand the question. Is it at all rel
18 matches
Mail list logo