On Mar 16 2011, Jay Ford wrote:
[...]
To me it looks like BIND is doing the right thing (as usual ;^),
Yes (or *a* right thing, anyway).
but the wikipedia... servers are returning bogus responses.
Yes. Specifically the response is neither a valid "nodata" response,
nor a valid referral. Di
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
The nameservers for wikipedia.org are broken. They put the wrong
SOA record in the negative response, wikipedia.org != wikimedia.org.
M vs P
Exactly.
The adminstrators of wikimedia.org were informed about this months
ago but they don'
Hi,
We have two internal Windows DNS servers which answer all DNS query by
forwarding it to gateway DNS server running in Redhat BIND. But i have a query
regarding allowing ROOT DNS query on internal DNS server.
Can anyone let me know whether company Internal DNS server should respond to
RO
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Mark Bergsma wrote:
On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Jay Ford wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
The nameservers for wikipedia.org are broken. They put the wrong
SOA record in the negative response, wikipedia.org != wikimedia.org.
The adminstrators of wikimedi
Zitat von babu dheen :
Hi,
We have two internal Windows DNS servers which answer all DNS query
by forwarding it to gateway DNS server running in Redhat BIND. But i
have a query regarding allowing ROOT DNS query on internal DNS server.
I guess it does not mean your internal servers shoul
Nah, that's fine (and normal).
BIND comes configured with the roots so that it can start resolution. I guess I
don't fully understand your concern here -- is it that you are worried that the
root might see queries and so know your internal hostnames?
W
Warren Kumari
--
Please excuse typing
6 matches
Mail list logo
