In article ,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> given the domain name of "126.com", and given an A RR in its zone is:
>
> s1.s2.s3 IN A 11.22.33.44
>
> OK when a dns cache query for s1.s2.s3.126.com the first time, it will
> follow the logic:
>
> #1, s1.s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no
Hello,
I have had a bit of a Google but I have been unsuccessful in finding
an answer to this one. We currently have bind acting as a slave
server for a number of different zones. The owners of these zones
sometimes change configuration without letting us know, resulting in
zones expiring. I w
I once wrote a perl script for nagios plugin and posted it to the list.
Just to check both master and slave's serial number to see if they are the
same to verify the zone data in every name server is correct.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Net::DNS;
use Getopt::Std;
my %opts;
getopts('hm:s
On 1 February 2011 10:04, wrote:
> I once wrote a perl script for nagios plugin and posted it to the list.
> Just to check both master and slave's serial number to see if they are the
> same to verify the zone data in every name server is correct.
Hello,
Thanks for this however it would be useful
See RFC1123 and RFC1912 which suggest that legitimate nodes on the Internet
have
appropriate forward/reverse DNS entries.
By appropriate, I mean DNS entires which distinguish which hosts are
static/business space from residential/dhcp space.
Reason: So others on the Internet can make informed
I have three questions regarding dnssec-signzone:
To clarify things, I'm using BIND 9.7.2-P2.
First is about input file: you can specify on the command line either the
signed version of the zone, or the unsigned one.
What I'd like to do hovever, is to use both.
The unsigned zone is much more re
Thanks for all the responses...learned a thing or two ;-)
What I was basically fishing for was whether using periods was acceptable
practice, frowned upon, or discretionary.
Thanks...
Vyto
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+vyto=fnal@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-
> user
Dear all,
I plan to upgrade my nameservers from bind8 to bind9.
I guess I will encounter some compatibility problems notably in the layout of
the zone files
- can anybody give me the point of attention for this upgrade? Your experience
will be appreciated.
- is it possible to install bind9
On 01/02/11 16:33, hugo hugoo wrote:
Dear all,
I plan to upgrade my nameservers from bind8 to bind9.
I guess I will encounter some compatibility problems notably in the
layout of the zone files
- can anybody give me the point of attention for this upgrade? Your
experience will be appreciated.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, hugo hugoo wrote:
> I plan to upgrade my nameservers from bind8 to bind9.
> I guess I will encounter some compatibility problems notably in the layout
> of the zone files
>
> - can anybody give me the point of attention for this upgrade? Your
> experience will be appreciated.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Torinthiel wrote:
To clarify things, I'm using BIND 9.7.2-P2.
First is about input file: you can specify on the command line either the
signed version of the zone, or the unsigned one.
What I'd like to do hovever, is to use both.
The unsigned zone is much more readable, and
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Torinthiel wrote:
Third is about -N option:
a well established practice (although I don't know what was the origin) is
to set SOA serial number to eg 2011020101, which is current day and
two-digit of daily version. This has benefit of being almost as good as
putting unixtime o
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:40:51AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> Joseph S D Yao writes:
>
> >
> > The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names. They must
> > start with a letter, end with a letter or digit, and have as interior
> > characters only letters, digits, and hyphen.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:11:47AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
...
> So I dont think dotted hostname is good pratical.
...
You need to read the whole posting. Another poster pointed out that the
dot _ I S _ the DNS delimiter.
--
/**
> I plan to upgrade my nameservers from bind8 to bind9.
> I guess I will encounter some compatibility problems notably in the layout
> of the zone files
Depends how freaky the zonefiles were before. You could end up having to
_not_ change a thing except for a couple of changes in your named.conf.
On 02/01/11 19:44, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Torinthiel wrote:
>
>>
>> To clarify things, I'm using BIND 9.7.2-P2.
>>
>> First is about input file: you can specify on the command line either
>> the
>> signed version of the zone, or the unsigned one.
>> What I'd like to do hovever, i
On 02/01/11 22:13, Jay Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Torinthiel wrote:
>> Third is about -N option:
>> a well established practice (although I don't know what was the
>> origin) is
>> to set SOA serial number to eg 2011020101, which is current day and
>> two-digit of daily version. This has ben
17 matches
Mail list logo
