Option "notify no" also disabled query log?

2010-12-06 Thread Drunkard Zhang
Hi, all. I'm using bind-9.7.2-P3, and I want to get query log, I pasted related configuration below: options { directory "/var/"; forward only; #listen-on port 53 { 10.198.2.249; 127.0.0.1; }; forwarders { 8.8.8.8; }; pid-file "file-n

Re: "can't validate existing negative responses (not a zone cut)" messages

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Thompson
On Oct 3 2010, I wrote: Since upgrading our main recursive nameservers to BIND 9.7.2-P2 (and using a trust anchor for the root and lookaside via dlv.isc.org) I am seeing a scatter of warning messages like this: Oct 1 19:47:19 dnssec: warning: validating @1c29d580: 115.197.101.95.IN-ADDR.ARPA

Re: "can't validate existing negative responses (not a zone cut)" messages

2010-12-06 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Chris Tho mpson writes: > On Oct 3 2010, I wrote: > > >Since upgrading our main recursive nameservers to BIND 9.7.2-P2 (and > >using a trust anchor for the root and lookaside via dlv.isc.org) I am > >seeing a scatter of warning messages like this: > > > >Oct 1 19:47:19 dnssec: warni

Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello, I am trying to allow the DNS-Client to do dynamic updates at the DNS-Server using BIND. I want to use Kerberos as the security protocol. For that I have a small test lab with a client, 3 Kerberos Server and one Suse Linux DNS-Server. The 3 Kerberos-Server are emulated with using VM-Ware.

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 02:20 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: I have read that there is a special mode called User-To-User Mode. This mode enables the client to ask for a service direct without asking for a That's not quite how u2u works. TGT before. I found out that my client use this special user-to-user mod

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Phil, thanx for your answer.I dont know really what the server offers because I dont get a valid response: Frame 2475: 168 bytes on wire (1344 bits), 168 bytes captured (1344 bits) Ethernet II, Src: xx, Dst: Vmware_x Internet Protocol, Src: , Dst

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 03:18 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: The Log-File from the DNS-SUSE-Server tells me "wrong principal". Is there a way to find out what principal it expects? You can configure it: tkey-domain "YOUR.DOMAIN"; tkey-gssapi-credential "DNS/hostname.your.domain"; (I've never

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Phil thanx again for your answer. So I read between the lines that even if there were bugfixes for GSSTSIG in Bind V. 9.7.2 - it dont work. So we have to wait until MS follow the standards? :-) Forgive me but what is a disjoint domain environment? thanx a lot, cheers, Juergen 2010/12/6 Ph

GSSTSIG - Can we do it? Do it REALLY work since Version 9.7.2? Still a bug?

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello, when you read my post before I try to make GSSTSIG run in a testlab environment with 1 Windows Kerberos-Client, 3 x Kerberos-Server (VMWare) and 1 x DNS-BIND-LINUX-Server (Suse). Bind-Version: 9.7.2 I do this now the 3rd week. I was reading a lot of books and manuals, doing a lot of confi

Fwd: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Nevarez, grats for sending it from your iPhone :-) But is there any message missing? thanx a lot and have a nice day cheers, Juergen -- Forwarded message -- From: Nevarez, Noe (DNSLB-NETWORKS) Date: 2010/12/6 Subject: Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux To: Jürgen

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Sergiu Bivol
> The client has an entry in the AD with DNS/test@test.loc. The Client, > DNS-Server, Kerberos-Server all have a copy of the krb5.keytab. If I do a > kinit -k -t c:\krb5.keytab DNS/test@test.loc then all seem to be ok. I > get this message from the DNSserver: 03-Dec-2010 10:42:00.451 gener

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 04:01 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: Hello Phil thanx again for your answer. So I read between the lines that even if there were bugfixes for GSSTSIG in Bind V. 9.7.2 - it dont work. So we have to wait until MS follow the standards? :-) That's not what I said. Forgive me but what is a

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Serjiu, many thanx for your hint. This I was asking me too for some time. Because the TGT is for the client name (principal) that is logged in at the moment and the service should be always for the same principal name on any client. So yes I will need to define 2 principals. You wrote: You s

Re: Option "notify no" also disabled query log?

2010-12-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: Drunkard Zhang > Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:54:31 +0800 > Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org > > Hi, all. I'm using bind-9.7.2-P3, and I want to get query log, I > pasted related configuration below: > > options { > directory "/var/"; > forward only; >

Re: Private Zones and Deligation bind9.7.2

2010-12-06 Thread Martin McCormick
Barry Margolin writes: > Do you have recursion enabled on your server? A good question. I have never explisitly disabled it and it appears to be on. We have an allow-query list based on ACL's so that callers from inside our networks get both recursive and nonrecursive lookups. Sp

Re: Private Zones and Deligation bind9.7.2

2010-12-06 Thread Jay Ford
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Martin McCormick wrote: the config for this private zone is: zone "r.ds" { type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/r.ds.zone"; allow-update { key updsrv; }; allow-query { any; }; #a list of slaves include "/etc/zoneconfigs/stwnotify"; n

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: > Hello Serjiu, > many thanx for your hint. This I was asking me too for some time. Because the > TGT is for the client name (principal) that is logged in at the moment and > the service should be always for the same principal name on any client. S

Re: Private Zones and Deligation bind9.7.2

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > Barry Margolin writes: > >> Do you have recursion enabled on your server? > > A good question. I have never explisitly disabled it and > it appears to be on. The default ACL for allow-recursion is { localhost; localnets; }. That means

named-checkzone error "NSEC node already exists"

2010-12-06 Thread jim
Hi, Running BIND 9.7.0-P2-RedHat-9.7.0-5.P2.el6 New setup/install and attempting to setup DNSSEC and clean any dirty data. Got the zone signed and ran named-checkzone against it and got the following (11) times: addnode: NSEC node already exists The .signed loads but want to have clean befor

Re: Private Zones and Deligation bind9.7.2 solved

2010-12-06 Thread Martin McCormick
Thanks to two list members, I immediately realized what I needed to do to make this work correctly. After setting up an authoritative zone for ds, I put in the NS and A records for the master server and then put in the A and NS records for r as a deligated zone. It all works fine,

Re: named-checkzone error "NSEC node already exists"

2010-12-06 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , jim writes: > --===8614228914376772213== > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630e869ed2ed50496c3d6e6 > > --00163630e869ed2ed50496c3d6e6 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > Running BIND 9.7.0-P2-RedHat-9.7.0-5.P2.el6 Upgrade. >

Re: Private Zones and Deligation bind9.7.2

2010-12-06 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Jay Ford wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Martin McCormick wrote: > > the config for this private zone is: > > > > zone "r.ds" { > > type master; > > file "/etc/namedb/master/r.ds.zone"; > >allow-update { > > key updsrv; > > }; > >allow-query { any; }; > > #a

Fwd: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Sergiu, I tried to put in 2 credential Entries in the named.conf: tkey-gssapi-credential "DNS/test.loc"; (that was in before) tkey-gssapi-credential "USER/test.loc", (new entry) tkey-domain "TEST.LOC"; The system didnt like the second entry for the user. So how can I put in 2 credentials, o