--- On Tue, 23/11/10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Subject: Re: can @ be CNAME?
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Received: Tuesday, 23 November, 2010, 3:58 PM
> On 23.11.10 15:50, Tech W. wrote:
> > can I set @ to a cname type? like:
> >
> > @ IN CNAME ww
On 23/11/2010 08:07, Tech W. wrote:
> --- On Tue, 23/11/10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>>> can I set @ to a cname type? like:
>>>
>>> @ IN CNAME www.example.com.
>>
>> Certainly not. for a domain you have you need SOA and NS
>> records, and CNAME
>> is incom
Thanks a lot Matthew.
>
> CNAME records are special. You can't have any other
> records for a label
> where you have a CNAME record (well, with the exception of
> RRSIG records
> if you're using DNSSEC). This is covered in great
> detail in any
> introductory text on DNS.
>
> The principle rea
Hi,
Hello!
My scenario is as follows:
I have the following network
192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS server for this zone
reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP upgrade to
a second DNS server is a sla
You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the
third server.
230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.
Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
Administrador de Sistemas.
Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411
El 23/11/2010 04:01
It makes the thread hard to follow!
> Why not?
> > Please don't top post.
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> My scenario is as follows:
> >>
> >> I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS
> >> se
In article ,
"Wilbert J. Rojas O." wrote:
> Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.
See RFC 2317 for the mechanism to delegate subnets of a /24.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:34 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> It makes the thread hard to follow!
what rot, its no worse than bottom posters, nor those who forget how to
trim replies to what's relevant, once you become responsible for this
list server, then you can choose, until then, please desist
Casey Deccio deccio.net> writes:
>
> I still don't have the answer to this.
Fair enough. I was just looking for clarification on your previous statements.
> Perhaps a BIND developer may
> have better insight into the log messages and what may be going on.
Yeah, I was hoping to have caught th
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Yeah, I was hoping to have caught the attention of a BIND developer
> here with all of this by now. Perhaps they just don't hang out here.
> Maybe I will try to find out where to ask questions that they might
> see.
I was reading it all along, b
11 matches
Mail list logo
