>We were looking about the forward configuration on BIND
and we found that there is the ?forward only? and ?forward first? option.
> If our partner configure our external zone on their DNS and configured
just this specific entry on the zone and configure the forward of the zone
> to
What does /etc/init.d/named do when you run it with the restart option?
That file is not part of the BIND distribution and is likely a shell
script so take a look and see what's its attempting to do.
I wonder if its running 'rndc stop' and not waiting for the process to
finish up before trying t
On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is not a bind problem, not really a DNS problem. I still hope that these
> might be able to help provide the solution.
>
> With the growing number of registrars of e.g. .com domains, it becomes
> difficult or even almost impossible
Thank you very much.
Stéphanas Schaden
stephan...@ctbc.com.br
Uberlândia - MG - Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: bind-users-bounces+stephanass=ctbc.com...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+stephanass=ctbc.com...@lists.isc.org] Em nome de
Barry Margolin
maybe this can be of help:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324315
On 11 November 2010 20:49, Carlos Vicente <
cvice...@network-services.uoregon.edu> wrote:
> Has anybody had this problem?
>
> # /etc/init.d/named restart
> Stopping named: . [FAILED]
Thank you everybody for the suggestions,
we decided to ask our business partner to create a specific zone for
the FQDN that it need to access in our internal network using the private IP
address. And to other names of our domain it will use the normal resolution
process of DNS.
Is it possible named was killed and restarted without
the /etc/init.d/named script?
The script looks up the process ID from /var/run/bind/run/named.pid (on
Debian) and if the PID doesn't match, the script can't stop named.
You can cat /var/run/bind/run/named.pid and compare the PID to what you
se
While running BIND 9.7.2-P2 built with defaults on F11
While processing:
Nov 12 06:07:57 maplepark sendmail[3928]: oACC7utt003928:
from=, size=5486,
class=-30, nrcpts=1, msgid=<003e01cb8262$1ee2b150$5ca813...@com.br>,
proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v6, relay=webster.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:1:d::12]
On 12/11/10 12:49, David Forrest wrote:
and, on checking named.conf, I found the entry for br. as:
trusted-keys {
"br." 257 3 5
"AwEAAdDoVnG9CyHbPUL2rTnE22uN66gQCrUW5W0NTXJBNmpZXP27w7PMNpyw3XCFQWP/XsT0pdzeEGJ400kdbbPqXr2lnmEtWMjj3Z/ejR8mZbJ/6OWJQ0k/2YOyo6Tiab1NGbGfs513y6dy1hOFpz+peZzGsCm
On 29.10.10 12:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
> And they can do a SMTP level rejection rather than waiting for the
> sending server to abandon sending the email due to multiple timeouts.
> Just return 550 for all mail directed to users at those hosts. It
> would be nice if we could standardise a MX targ
In message <20101112135657.gb22...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 29.10.10 12:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > And they can do a SMTP level rejection rather than waiting for the
> > sending server to abandon sending the email due to multiple timeouts.
> > Just return 550 for all mail
> In message <20101112135657.gb22...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> writes:
> > On 29.10.10 12:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > And they can do a SMTP level rejection rather than waiting for the
> > > sending server to abandon sending the email due to multiple timeouts.
> > > Just return 550
On 11/12/2010 7:49 AM, David Forrest wrote:
> While running BIND 9.7.2-P2 built with defaults on F11
[..]
> and, on checking named.conf, I found the entry for br. as:
> trusted-keys {
> "br." 257 3 5
> "AwEAAdDoVnG9CyHbPUL2rTnE22uN66gQCrUW5W0NTXJBNmpZXP27w7PMNpyw3XCFQWP/XsT0pdzeEGJ400kdbbPqXr
I recently went through this and have it working. Look through the archives for
'GSS-TSIG and Active Directory'.
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/mmsearch/bind-users?config=bind-users.htsearch&restrict=&exclude=&method=and&format=short&sort=score&words=GSS-TSIG+and+Active+Directory
Things to check:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 11/12/2010 7:49 AM, David Forrest wrote:
While running BIND 9.7.2-P2 built with defaults on F11
[..]
and, on checking named.conf, I found the entry for br. as:
trusted-keys {
"br." 257 3 5
"AwEAAdDoVnG9CyHbPUL2rTnE22uN66gQCrUW5W0NTXJBNmpZXP27w7P
On 12/11/10 14:51, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 11/12/2010 7:49 AM, David Forrest wrote:
While running BIND 9.7.2-P2 built with defaults on F11
[..]
and, on checking named.conf, I found the entry for br. as:
trusted-keys {
"br." 257 3 5
"AwEAAdDoVnG9CyHbPUL2rTnE22uN66gQCrUW5W0NTXJBNmpZXP27w7PMN
Not a hole if you look at the reasoning for Fedora itself. It has a
short lifecycle and they expressly tell folks not to use it for
Production due to this. It is meant to be bleeding edge for testing the
latest/greatest. It is used as a test bed for what makes it into RHEL.
For Production (RP
On 12/11/10 15:45, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
For Production (RPM based system) you should use RHEL or CentOS which
has a much longer life cycle. (Speaking of which, RHEL6 was just put in
I don't agree with your line of reasoning. RHEL may have longer update
cycles, but there's no guarantee a par
It is possible. I found that named wasn't logging to the configured
/var/log/named because logrotate failed to reload named after creating
the new file. If rndc stop was timing out because the daemon was trying
to write to the log file, then it could have been a catch 22 situation.
I have since re
I am currently using libbind to do dynamic updates in "C".
I have looked in the bind 9.7.x source and I don't see a replacement mechanism
for this.
Is there one or is there one planned in bind10?
Thanks
--
Jack.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@
Am building a new nameserver, with vanilla CentOS 5.5, and am in the home
stretch. I see one last anomalous message that says:
"adjusted limit on open files from 1024 to 1048576"
The named service works just fine.I have about 260 zone files...or is
this just adjusting the number o
Thank you both and Kevin I for one would really appreciate if you
would compose that web page and put it out there!
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Stacey Jonathan Marshall wrote:
Additionally a wildcard record in one of the the searched domains
would cause a false positive to be returned causi
If I use dig NS I know I will see the NS records for the domain.
I know I can do the same thing for other RR types. In the case where a zone
file has RR records that define delegation for subdomains why can't I use this
dig command to see those delegations? I assume this is easy and it's jus
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, M. Meadows wrote:
If I use dig NS I know I will see the NS records for the
domain. I know I can do the same thing for other RR types. In the case
where a zone file has RR records that define delegation for subdomains why
can't I use this dig command to see those delegation
I believe I found a bug in the libbind code.
Is this the correct place to report that?
Thanks
--
jack
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
In message <20101112143542.ga23...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> > In message <20101112135657.gb22...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wri
> tes:
> > > On 29.10.10 12:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > > And they can do a SMTP level rejection rather than waiting for the
> > > > sen
It would be interesting to have an API that we could use to make changes
dynamically to DNS zones.
I don't know if there is already such a tool.
No dia 12 de Nov de 2010, às 18:57, "Jack Tavares" escreveu:
> I am currently using libbind to do dynamic updates in "C".
>
>
>
> I have looked in
In message <4cdd6467.9050...@imperial.ac.uk>, Phil Mayers writes:
> On 12/11/10 15:45, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>
> > For Production (RPM based system) you should use RHEL or CentOS which
> > has a much longer life cycle. (Speaking of which, RHEL6 was just put in
>
> I don't agree with your line o
Lads,
Isn't this getting ridiculous?
Is this the future of DNSSEC?
Ian
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+ian.t=thoughtbubble@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+ian.t=thoughtbubble@lists.isc.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Andrews
Sent: 13 November 2010 00:36
To: Phil Maye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello bind network
hello guru of bind
hello everybody
i have all a slice of ipv6 address 2001:41D0:2:3Dd6::/64
and I would simply change it with my bind ipv6
please you have to be in your answer or I will not understand
Please give concrete examples
30 matches
Mail list logo
