Clarification

2010-10-22 Thread rams
Hi, What is the bind response when queried MX record. The MX record is having prefernce value is greater than maximum of preference value [ex: 65536]. Thanks & Regards, Ramesh ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mai

Re: Clarification

2010-10-22 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:05:06PM +0530, rams wrote a message of 38 lines which said: > What is the bind response when queried MX record. % dig @ns3.nic.fr MX nic.fr ; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> @ns3.nic.fr MX nic.fr ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- op

clarification

2010-10-22 Thread rams
Hi, I have a record in BIND as follows: mxdomain.com. 86400 IN MX 65536 gmail.com. When I query "mxdomain.com." with type MX. What is the bind response. Is there any RFC mentioned about this . Thanks & Regards, Ramesh ___ bind-users mailing list bind-

Loading MX record with illegal preference (Lame subject replaced: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:01:22PM +0530, rams wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > I have a record in BIND as follows: > > mxdomain.com. 86400 IN MX 65536 gmail.com. I don't think you tell us the truth. Because BIND refuses to load it: % named-checkzone example large-mx.zone dns_rdat

Re: Loading MX record with illegal preference (Lame subject replaced: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread John Wingenbach
https://www.isc.org/files/arm96.html#types_of_resource_records_and_when_to_use_them Scroll down to the data type MX and it says: Identifies a mail exchange for the domain with a 16-bit preference value (lower is better) followed by the host name of the mail exchange. Described in RFC 974, RFC

Re: Loading MX record with illegal preference (Lame subject replaced: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> Subject: Loading MX record with illegal preference (Lame subject replaced: > clarification Because subject was replaced I didn't find it before my response :) ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listin

Re: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, rams wrote: > I have a record in BIND as follows: >   > mxdomain.com. 86400 IN MX 65536 gmail.com. How did you get named to load this? If your named does load it, what version of BIND are you using? You should get "out of range". (See named-checkzone too.) > When I query "

Re: Loading MX record with illegal preference (Lame subject replaced: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:02:49AM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote a message of 8 lines which said: > Because subject was replaced I didn't find it before my response :) You should really used a threaded mail client software (which understands the In-Reply-To: header) :-)

Re: "can't validate existing negative responses (not a zone cut)" messages

2010-10-22 Thread Tony Finch
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Chris Thompson wrote: > > Oct 3 16:53:10 dnssec: warning: validating @14c9cd70: > 98.206.101.95.IN-ADDR.ARPA PTR: > can't validate existing negative responses (not a zone cut) > > What do they mean, exactly? And should I be worrying about them? > They all seem to refer to PTR

Re: clarification

2010-10-22 Thread John Wobus
On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:31 AM, rams wrote: I have a record in BIND as follows: mxdomain.com. 86400 IN MX 65536 gmail.com. When I query "mxdomain.com." with type MX. What is the bind response. Is there any RFC mentioned about this . On the wire, the MX preference is carried in a 16-bit field,

Re: Clarification on delegated NS

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , rams writes: > Hi , > > When I created delegated NS record. Bind 9.7.1 p3 is giving SERVFAIL , when > i queried for NS delegated record with NS. > > Could you please clarify me or is it bug in 9.7? To see the delegation you need to make a non recursive query (+norec). dig