In message , rams
writes:
> Hi ,
>
> When I created delegated NS record. Bind 9.7.1 p3 is giving SERVFAIL , when
> i queried for NS delegated record with NS.
>
> Could you please clarify me or is it bug in 9.7?
To see a delegation you need to do:
dig +norec ns zone @parent
> Thanks
Hello,
I am puzzled with a bind config for a kind of dns-reverse-proxy situation.
I have a server with only one public IP addresse, bind running on
port 53 of it.
This bind serves examples.net. A subdomain dynsub.example.net
should be served on some other software answering DNS request
with dyna
On 29.09.10 10:43, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
> I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph
> representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png
on how many processors was this ran?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT t
1 QuadCore Intel i7 920 on Fedora 11 x86_64 (can't remember the exact
kernel version) with and without hyperthreading and overclocked
ranging between 2.8 and 3.4GHz
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 29.09.10 10:43, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
>> I did some benchmar
Thanks. It took a long time to sort out the root cause because EDNS0
(dig @host record.sample +edns=0) caused no problems, only +dnssec
caused failures. The business partner has already fixed their firewall
(allow_dnssec_bit=1 on CheckPoint), but I wanted to understand the root
cause in order to p
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Taylor, Gord wrote:
>
> The business partner has already fixed their firewall
> (allow_dnssec_bit=1 on CheckPoint)
Just in case anyone else is worried about interop problems, I note that
allow_dnssec_bit=1 is the default setting. A CheckPoint firewall
administrator has to deli
Does anyone actually have GSS-TSIG working with an Active Directory? I see
plenty of posts from people trying to get it to work. I have yet to see anyone
who claims to actually have it working. Did MS change something in 2008r2 since
GSS-TSIG was implemented in bind to make it inoperable?
__
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
> Does anyone actually have GSS-TSIG working with an Active Directory?
There are some GSS-TSIG interop fixes in 9.7.2.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREA
On 2010-09-30, at 11:24 AM, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
> Does anyone actually have GSS-TSIG working with an Active Directory? I see
> plenty of posts from people trying to get it to work. I have yet to see
> anyone who claims to actually have it working. Did MS change something in
> 2008r2 since
Sorry, I spent most of the last two weeks locked in a conference room
and mostly off net, still catching up.
At Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:54:54 -0600, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
>
> DNS Standard query TKEY
> 472-ms-7.32-1772bef1.ddfb6613-c726-11df-dfa0-005056a22c3e
>Queries
>472-ms-7.32-1772
Per-zone recursion control doesn't exist in BIND, because frankly it
doesn't make sense.
Either a zone type is meaningless *without* recursion (type forward,
type stub), or recursion is *unnecessary* because the nameserver answers
from authoritative data (type master, type slave).
Put anothe
Hi,
I have configured records as follows in bind. When we start the bind 9.7,
bind is not starting.
But bind is started successfully when commented below ns domains which are
marked as RED. Could you please clarify me.
*Note: Bind 9.6 is started successfully with the same below zone. *
Error:
zon
12 matches
Mail list logo
