Hey Guys,
I have an issue which need some help.
I have two master DNS servers, say A & B.
A is running freebsd & B is running centos. B is running BIND 9 also.
Now, I want to add one more to this cluster say C.
I have installed centos in C with BIND 9. Now, I have copied
/etc/named.conf & /var/
Am Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:51:11 +0530
schrieb Sherin George :
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have an issue which need some help.
>
> I have two master DNS servers, say A & B.
>
> A is running freebsd & B is running centos. B is running BIND 9 also.
> Now, I want to add one more to this cluster say C.
>
> I ha
Hello Torsten,
Thanks for looking into this.
Basically, my previous question came from my ignorance. But, I learned
more and I think found the answer.
"The SOA MNAME field is used by NOTIFY and by dynamic update.
Authoritative name servers send NOTIFY messages to all name servers in
NS records t
For lack of response here, the heimdal guys are putting in a
work-around for this bind bug.
Sam
On 25/08/10 17:41, Sam Liddicott wrote:
I've
also reported this as a bind bug, but I'm posting it here as I
think it answers the case for the BSD user i
I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions
regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp?
If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number
as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by
the ISP, need they be concerne
Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions
> regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp?
>
> If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number
> as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by
>
Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 03:05 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message<4c891404.3000...@imperial.ac.uk>, Phil Mayers writes:
>>> On 09/09/2010 03:45 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
>>>
There is other advice in the ARM that says to put 'your organization's
public keys in the truste
Although its not perfect, you can look into IP protocol 41 which is IPv6 in
IPv4. Helps provide some functionality in a last resort case.
Jim Pazarena wrote:
>I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions
>regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 cam
Mark,
I must be opaque; I don't see how to make this approach work in any
reasonable way.
I tried this:
(DLV is enabled, and my external keys for example.com are there.)
view "r-internal" in {
match-clients { !any_external; all_internal; };
match-recursive-only yes;
transfer-source
9 matches
Mail list logo
