Re: Load Balancer for DNS

2010-04-06 Thread sasa sasa
anycast looks fine and cheaper for us. Thanks everyone, I appreciate your help. regards, Sasa From: Dan Durrer To: Matthew Pounsett Cc: sasa sasa ; bind dns Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 6:47:42 PM Subject: Re: Load Balancer for DNS Yes, we've been using the ip

Re: Load Balancer for DNS

2010-04-06 Thread Dmitry Rybin
05.04.2010 10:06, sasa sasa пишет: > Hello everyone, > > Any one used any load balancer for DNSs? any recommendation? it's 2 > caching-only DNSs, and I'd like to make a load balance between them > using software. > Simple - Linux, FreeBSD firewall as balancer :) (30k qps) Can give you ex

Problem with 9.6.2-p1

2010-04-06 Thread Daniel Ryslink
By the way, similar problem occurs in 9.6.2-p1. According to changelog, support for RSA/SHA-256 (algorithm number 8 in dnssec-related records) was backported into 9.6.2 from 9.7 (and indeed, 9.6.2 has no problems with the TLDs recently signed with keys using RSA/SHA-256) However, after upgra

Re: Load Balancer for DNS

2010-04-06 Thread Gordon A. Lang
The Cisco CSS (and the newer Cisco ACE module) load balancers handle DNS very well by disabling flow management for port 53 UDP packets. The CSS provides a robust single point of service for DNS that isolates the clients from the back-end servers. We also use anycasting with multipe CSS's adv

socket is not connected error

2010-04-06 Thread Youssif J. Al-Mesfer
Does anyone know what might be causing these bind error messages? BIND Apr 6 10:01:51 named[690]: [ID 12345 daemon.error] client 10.10.10.10#54672: transfer of 'com.kw/IN': send: socket is not connected Currently we have 6 clients Thanks Youssif _