Michael Sinatra wrote:
> On 02/24/10 01:25, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> DNScurve advocates, on the other hand, point out that DNS isn't
>>> encrypted. Well, neither is the phone book. So what?
>>>
>> So the protocol is vulnerable to both local and remote forgery attacks,
>> just li
* Kevin Darcy:
> I'm not sure those recommendations apply as strongly as they used
> to. Now we have views and (if the original poster were to upgrade to
> 9.4.x or higher) fine-grained control over access to cached data.
Views are probably okay. Access control is insufficient, especially
if you
2 matches
Mail list logo