On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:50:56AM +0100, fddi wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to setup a local named configuration so that ANY request will be
> resolved
> to a specific single IP only.
>
> I mean any kind of DNS resolutin request
>
> www.luth.se
> www.isc.org
> www.anything.tld
>
> should be resolve
see my comments below ...
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:50:56AM +0100, fddi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I need to setup a local named configuration so that ANY request will be
> > resolved
> > to a specific single IP only.
> >
> > I mean any kind of
thank you for the precious suggestion
I just missed the * hint :)
so my configuration was almost done.
here is the final configuration and it works...
thanks to all
$TTL86400
$ORIGIN .
@ 1D IN SOA @ root (
42 ;
Hi,
We have two registered name servers to answer internet queries. One is on
site and the other is a service of our ISP. The problem is that every once
in a while the secondary server doesn¹t successfully complete zone transfers
and the data expires. I¹m not sure what technically how the serve
On February 2, 2010 2:25:50 PM -0800 Rob Tanner
wrote:
cached (i.e. Is no data treated the same as bad data by upstream bind
servers?
I didn't entirely follow your ramble (paragraphs would have helped),
but it's not BIND or other nameservers that would be the real problem,
it's the application
On 2/2/2010 5:25 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
We have two registered name servers to answer internet queries. One
is on site and the other is a service of our ISP. The problem is that
every once in a while the secondary server doesn't successfully
complete zone transfers and the data expires.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:05:12PM +0100, fddi wrote:
> thank you for the precious suggestion
>
> I just missed the * hint :)
>
> so my configuration was almost done.
>
> here is the final configuration and it works...
> thanks to all
I'm amazed that this works.
Oh, I see why - it thinks that
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:03:32AM -0500, Joe Baptista wrote:
...
> > instance, this had better be the name server, as well! NO OTHER IP
...
You know, when I wrote this I was thinking of the recommended separate
resolving name server from authoritative name server. But in the case
our friend fr
8 matches
Mail list logo