Hi there,
Quote:
"ENOENT
op was EPOLL_CTL_MOD or EPOLL_CTL_DEL, and fd is not in epfd. "
It just means, that the poll set was supposed to be modified, but the
descriptor was not part of it. Not really an error, but a condition that
should rather not happen. But it should certainly not be t
Hi guys,
I hope this is possible to do and someone can help me doing it!
Basically I have an authoritative DNS server located at IP 81.178.2.118
running on Solaris 9 with 3 views; one for internal clients, one for my
current location (which has a static IP address as I'm running an
internet t
Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi guys,
I hope this is possible to do and someone can help me doing it!
Basically I have an authoritative DNS server located at IP
81.178.2.118 running on Solaris 9 with 3 views; one for internal
clients, one for my current location (which has a static IP address as
I'm ru
$ dig beer.com ns @dpns1.dnsnameserver.org
; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> beer.com ns @dpns1.dnsnameserver.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 401
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;bee
Hi Kevin,
first up thanks for the response!
Secondly the non-recursive query you asked for shows this:
% dig +norec rd1.optiplex-networks.com
; <<>> DiG 9.5.1-P2.1 <<>> +norec rd1.optiplex-networks.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Sorry
Hello,
I am trying to understand the behavior of bind resolver regarding a
particular issue. Let us say a resolver A sends a query to a server B.
If the response is too big, B will set the TC flag. Let's assume that
the truncated portion was NOT part of the additional section since I
believe in t
Hi folks, whats the difference between recursion no; and
allow-recursion {none;};
Thanks
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http://www.ardynet.com
http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
ht
Thanks Sven.
so the resource unavailable messages mean nothing?
thanks
Mike
Sven Eschenberg wrote:
Hi there,
Quote:
"ENOENT
op was EPOLL_CTL_MOD or EPOLL_CTL_DEL, and fd is not in epfd. "
It just means, that the poll set was supposed to be modified, but the
descriptor was not part o
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 19:47 -0800, Mike wrote:
> Can someone help me understand? Here is a snippet from the strace output:
>
>
> 19120 <... futex resumed> ) = 1
> 19120 epoll_ctl(8, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 517, {EPOLLIN, {u32=517, u64=517}}) = 0
For EPOLL_CTL_DEL, the last argument, the epoll_
Hi Mike,
I don't know about the inner Working of the epoll calls, so I will
describe this in a more general way.
Usually IO operations (i.e. a read) would block the call, untill data is
available. If you have multiple io streams, this is problematic.
What you do instead is, you tell the system
Thanks Nick for the 'insight' of epoll.
Usually I'd expect an application to have a 'knowledge' of which FS were
added to a set for watching. In such a case I would not really expect
any return values indicating that one tried to remove an FD, that was
never added.
Could this indicate a misma
At Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:36:27 +0200,
Imri Zvik wrote:
> > i have a high load DNS server running bind 9.4.3 on RH -
> > yesterday we experienced a problem with the bind (the bind froze) , and
> > when looking at the logs i saw the following error :
> > named error: socket: file descriptor exceeds
12 matches
Mail list logo
