It appears that dig is printing results that it attributes to the wrong
server.
While troubleshooting an inconsistent NS issue (upstream from us), a trace
(at the end of this message) shows that DNS3.UIOWA.EDU listed two NS
records, when in fact, if you query DNS3.UIOWA.EDU for the domain in
quest
If you send the server a recursive query, you get an answer from its
cache. If you sent it an iterative query, you get a referral from its
authoritative zone.
$ dig @DNS3.UIOWA.EDU sioux-center.k12.ia.us ns +noall +auth +norec
; <<>> DiG 9.4.3-P1 <<>> @DNS3.UIOWA.EDU sioux-center.k12.ia.us n
> It appears that dig is printing results that it attributes to the wrong
> server.
Not really.
> While troubleshooting an inconsistent NS issue (upstream from us), a trace
> (at the end of this message) shows that DNS3.UIOWA.EDU listed two NS
> records, when in fact, if you query DNS3.UIOWA.EDU
Wow, I wasn't aware of that nuance. I have been making incorrect
assumptions.
It doesn't make sense to me how DNS3.UIOWA.EDU can return the correct cached
result for the NS records of sioux-center.k12.ia.us but an incorrect "norec"
result. Doesn't specifying "no recursion" mean that it has to be
Thanks for the response. The wheels are already in motion to get this
inconsistency resolved. Unfortunately, the stated response time for this
state agency is 2 weeks. =(
Frank
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 11:20 AM
T
> It doesn't make sense to me how DNS3.UIOWA.EDU can return the correct cached
> result for the NS records of sioux-center.k12.ia.us but an incorrect "norec"
> result. Doesn't specifying "no recursion" mean that it has to be either
> authoritative for that domain or have the entry cached in order
Ok, now I'm following youI don't live and breathe this like you and
Chris do. =)
If the dns3.uiowa.edu's cache was flushed for sioux-center.k12.ia.us, what
do you think the query results for
dig @DNS3.UIOWA.EDU sioux-center.k12.ia.us ns +noall +answer
would be?
Frank
-Original M
> If the dns3.uiowa.edu's cache was flushed for sioux-center.k12.ia.us, what
> do you think the query results for
> dig @DNS3.UIOWA.EDU sioux-center.k12.ia.us ns +noall +answer
> would be?
I think you would get what you get right now with +norec, *until* the
name server acquired some of the
At 08:53 16-05-2009, Frank Bulk wrote:
It appears that dig is printing results that it attributes to the wrong
server.
While troubleshooting an inconsistent NS issue (upstream from us), a trace
[snip]
sioux-center.k12.ia.us. 28800 IN NS ns1.netins.net.
sioux-center.k12.ia.us. 288
Yes, dns.mtcnet.net does not resolve because that host name been deprecated,
although the IP address it represented still functions, but only as a
caching-only server limited to our customer base. The organization that
manages k12.ia.us was informed of the changes over a month ago and almost
all o
In message , "Frank Bulk" write
s:
> Wow, I wasn't aware of that nuance. I have been making incorrect
> assumptions.
>
> It doesn't make sense to me how DNS3.UIOWA.EDU can return the correct cached
> result for the NS records of sioux-center.k12.ia.us but an incorrect "norec"
> result. Doesn't
11 matches
Mail list logo