> Original Message
> Subject: Re: about resolving on a child zone
> From: Chris Buxton
> Date: Mon, April 13, 2009 10:31 am
> To: Tech W.
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> In this case, the answer is that your main zone (example.com) will
> have an error, because it will
Hi all,
Can any one help me out, I'm having a problem setting up Dynamic DNS updates
using TSIG. I'm running ISC Bind 9 on SLES 10 and ISC DHCP 3.0.3 on SLES 10. I
need to get my DHCP to update my DNS. Here is my DNS and DHCP config plus the
error i'm getting from nsupdate. hostnames and IPs hav
Thanks for chris, barry and all.
--- On Tue, 14/4/09, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> There's a special exception made for "glue" records, since
> they're
> needed to prevent an infinite recursion. The parent
> zone will include
> this A record.
Enjoy a safer web experience. Upgrade to
On Apr 14, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Jeff Pang wrote:
In this case, the answer is that your main zone (example.com) will
have an error, because it will have an A record below the "bottom" of
the zone that is not a glue record. In other words, it will recognize
that www.my.example.com belongs to my.exampl
Hello All,
I have a little problem while setting up my DNS.
In my LAN I want to use the local domain go.wiki. So I make the following
settings to the bind9 on my ubuntu server (hardy):
named.conf:
===
include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options";
zone "." {
type hint;
file "/etc/
On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Frank Moeller wrote:
/etc/bind/db.go.wiki:
$ORIGIN go.wiki.
$TTL 1D
@ IN SOA localhost. hostmaster. (
200405191 ; serial
8H; refresh
4H; retry
Hello,
Which TTL value is supposed to be used for negative caching time?
-We are running BIND 9.X as a caching server. We are seeing that NXDOMAIN
replies are being cached using $TTL time of a given zone instead of its SOA min
TTL time.
-Is $TTL suppose to override SOA's min TTL for t
Hi all,
I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
sense based on my config) is that any host with the appropriate key is
allowed to perform a zone-transfer.
Is there any way to limit the zone-transfer
On Apr 14 2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
No, I didn't mean positionally within the zone file. Record order is
mostly irrelevant in zone files (but the SOA record must be first).
No, it need not be first.
It's *conventional* to put it first.
It's only *necessary* if you (a) have no $TTL directive
On Apr 14 2009, Lena M wrote:
Which TTL value is supposed to be used for negative caching time?
-We are running BIND 9.X
That's an awful lot of versions of BIND. Can't you be more specific?
as a caching server. We are seeing that NXDOMAIN
replies are being cached usi
On Apr 14 2009, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
sense based on my config) is that any host with the appropriate key is
allowed to perform a zone-transfer.
Is ther
Thanks!
/Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Apr 14 2009, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
>
>> I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
>> lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
>> sense based on my config) is
12 matches
Mail list logo
