[Top-posting de-swizzled]
On Mar 15 2009, Ben Bridges wrote:
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Alan Clegg
[...]
Charles Lee wrote:
I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa
The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in,
becaus
Hello,
I'm using a linux box with 4 core CPUs.
How can I make the new downloaded bind-9.6 support multi-processors?
Thanks.
Ralf.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
At Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:25:57 +0800,
Ralf Peng wrote:
> I'm using a linux box with 4 core CPUs.
> How can I make the new downloaded bind-9.6 support multi-processors?
Build it with threads:
% ./configure --enable-threads [and other config options if necessary]
% make
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet
Thanks.
Is threads stable enough in product use of Bind?
2009/3/17 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 :
> At Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:25:57 +0800,
> Ralf Peng wrote:
>
>> I'm using a linux box with 4 core CPUs.
>> How can I make the new downloaded bind-9.6 support multi-processors?
>
> Build it with threads:
>
> %
At Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:47:10 +0800,
Ralf Peng wrote:
> Is threads stable enough in product use of Bind?
It would depend on the definition of stability and of product use:-)
As far as I know, many people happily use BIND9 with threads in an
environment which would normally be called 'in product'
Hello all,
We're seing intermittent name resolution for spmonline.lb2.petronas.com.my
but can't seem to pin the issue down. While troubleshooting I noticed that
their nameserver will return an NXDOMAIN answer whenever a TCP query is sent
and thought I'd bingo'ed the issue down.
# dig @lb2jr.
It's a load balancer which intercepts A queries and passes
everything else to the nameserver behind it which knows
nothing about spmonline.lb2.petronas.com.my so it returns
NXDOMAIN. As you have IPv6 aware applications they make
queries which results
7 matches
Mail list logo
