* Shane W.:
> Bind outputs:
> Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid RRSIG resolving
> 'odyssey.csy.ca/NS/IN': 72.55.146.170#53
> Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid RRSIG resolving
> 'odyssey.csy.ca/NS/IN': 96.49.174.96#53
> Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid R
Hello Bind9 Geeks/Nerds and whoever,
I have the need for a GeoIP Database but the one from Maxmind peoduce a
Disk-IO as the hell. Now my Idea is to use my bind9 to archive my goal.
In general, I need ONLY the contry code for a given IP but I a not
disinclined to put more infos in the data
What about using bind-dlz and use a mysql database for the records?
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Hello Bind9 Geeks/Nerds and whoever,
>
>I have the need for a GeoIP Database but the one from Maxmind peoduce a
>Disk-IO as the hell. Now my Idea is to use my bind9 to archive my goal.
>
>In general, I
Greetings-
I need to run a PTR zone for a network smaller than 24 bit.
I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa
The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in,
because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically run
address .96
* Shane W.:
>> There should be a signed NSEC record showing that the delegation is,
>> indeed, unsigned.
>
> Well we're using nsec3 if that matters but if it's not
> being signed correctly, is that likely a bug with how we're
> calling dnssec-signzone?
Ah, in that case, you probably haven't upgra
Charles Lee wrote:
> I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa
>
> The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in,
> because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically
> run address .96 to address .127)
>
> Can anyone help out wit
I agree, it's arbitrary. If you are wanting to format the name of your zone
similarly to the RFC, I believe the format would be
96/27.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa (for the subnet 195.212.51.96/27).
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Alan Clegg
Sen
It sounds like you are looking for some configuration shorthand for BIND that
will allow you to configure it to be authoritative for the 16 /24's comprising
the /20 without having to explicitly configure 16 zones on BIND. I think
you're out of luck - BIND needs to have a zone statement for each
Ed (I didn't see your post to the list?),
I tend to agree with Ben, I looked into this a few years ago and
couldn't see a way, decided it was less time to write a perl script to
automate it all than to keep experimenting.
It creates the PTR zone, adds to named.conf and adds the corresponding A
re
9 matches
Mail list logo
