On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:03:14 -0500, R Dicaire faxed us with
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
>> I have to admit that I am a bit baffled by this one. =A0I can query
>> against my bandwidth providers name servers (Comcast) and get name
>> resolution just fine for the hostnam
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match up wide spans of ranges
> > Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
> > specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
> > netblock in Russia:
> >
> > 05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
> > IN NS +
> > 05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 s
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, enigmedia wrote:
Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
netblock in Russia:
05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
IN NS +
05-Mar-2009 12:18
One thing I should add is that chasing down lack of BCP38 compliance
isn't "wack-a-mole" though it may feel like it. This is a configuration
change and as such tends to be premanent especially once it get written
into the procedures documents.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Val
In article ,
Stephen Ward wrote:
> Just a quick silly question.
>
> Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
> does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
> email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
>
> Rather than have to ent
There are other DNS servers that do a better job for RBLs.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Ward
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:20 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Zonefiles & CIDR
Stephen Ward wrote:
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match
Kevin Darcy wrote:
> But, as far as I can tell, there's no *practical* reason to disallow
> underscores, other than the fact that it may trip the standards-checking
> code of some _other_ piece of software. So, piece of software A
> disallows underscores because it's worried about causing a proble
9 matches
Mail list logo
