On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 01:07:36PM -0500,
Matthew Huff wrote
a message of 62 lines which said:
> Spoofing the dns zones are the only solution.
It won't work when (if) DNSSEC will be deployed (and I assume the
banking sector will be one of the first to adopt it)...
Why not using your own XMP
Mark Andrews wrote:
> Mark Andrews writes:
>
>> In message <49ac5d59.1010...@ruilopes.com>, Rui Lopes writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ben Bridges wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
You could try creating example.test as a forward zone in named.conf on
your sun server and specifying plesk as t
>> Spoofing the dns zones are the only solution.
> Why not using your own XMPP server, that you control and where you can
> activate logging?
Actually, in a previous lifetime, we discovered that the MOST effective
way to deal with this was to write it into the policy and procedures
manual and ma
Hello,
I'm trying to create a private "test." zone for use in my local
"testing lab".
I've setup an recursive DNS server that will serve the "test." zone
(in Sun host; see the network diagram bellow).
The resolution of a domain in the "test" zone works as expected, eg:
dig sun.test
; <<>> D
Dear all bind users,
I am new to manage 3 BIND 9 servers, lately, I got some complains about users
cannot connect to
some websites while they use our BIND 9 servers, this issue will be solved if
they use other
ISP's BIND 8 servers, one example is as below. Can we modify any configurations
of
Thank u for you response, i'll install the version that u recommend me, any
consideration to follow up?, also I've assume that the problem that i had
was for the general: error: socket: too many open but finally i've
found that the domains that my server cannot resolve was for and ACL Bogon,
t
Thanks Jeff and Robert,
Robert's plan seems to be the best way to do the thing so I'll follow
that plan ;)
Thanks again,
Thomas.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 17:39, Jeff Lightner wrote:
> In your case it sounds like you're going to have two external IPs. If so I'd
> leave the Apache server with B
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:39:40AM +0800, bradonkuo wrote:
> Dear all bind users,
Hi Brandon,
> I am new to manage 3 BIND 9 servers, lately, I got some complains about users
> cannot connect to
> some websites while they use our BIND 9 servers, this issue will be solved if
> they use other
> I
Hello all,
I'm running BIND 9.5.0-P1 on a Solaris 10. My question is I think a combination
of BIND logging and the syslog in Solaris. Below is the logging as in the
named.conf
logging {
channel my_syslog {
syslog daemon;
severity info;
};
Since you're not getting any response from your server (I'm assumimg
dns.tp.edu.tw is your server), you might want to check and make sure there are
no firewalls or ACL's blocking dns requests to your name servers.
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.or
I am unable to resolve visitriverside.com with my Bind 9 server. I don't
have any problems resolving other domains, it just appears to be this host.
http://www.perturb.org/code/dns-tool.php?host=visitriverside.com&type=A
I can't resolve the name servers for this domain either. If I check my
na
> What I'm trying to do is log /var/bind/named.stats in a separate node.
Note that file name is commonly used for the "rndc stats" statistics-file.
It may be a good idea to use a different name so you don't cause confusion
or conflict.
> So my question is, can I specify the node IP address and
Jeremy,
Thanks for the response. Yes I need to change the file name to avoid confusion.
Yes I can forward the syslog to a different node my making changes in the
syslogger. But I'm not sure how to make such changes so that only named/bind
related syslog will be forwarded and the rest will conti
Something like the following might work.
BIND:
...
channel my_syslog {
syslog local6;
severity info;
};
...
syslog.conf:
...
local6.* @remote-syslog-server // Forward all messages
with local6 facility t
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:58:28AM -0800,
Scott Baker wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> I am unable to resolve visitriverside.com with my Bind 9 server. I
> don't have any problems resolving other domains, it just appears to
> be this host.
visitriverside.com is highly broken: it has
In message <397019c15b5a45899bb02b1b212e1...@bradon>, "bradonkuo" writes:
> Dear all bind users,
>
> I am new to manage 3 BIND 9 servers, lately, I got some complains about =
> users cannot connect to=20
>
> some websites while they use our BIND 9 servers, this issue will be =
> solved if they u
In message <49ace778.6040...@ruilopes.com>, Rui Lopes writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Mark Andrews writes:
> >
> >> In message <49ac5d59.1010...@ruilopes.com>, Rui Lopes writes:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Ben Bridges wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> You could try creating example.t
Jeff Lightner wrote:
I have been talked with getting named with DLZ support on Red Hat 5.2
Enterprise. I have never worked on Red Hat or with RPM, can someone
point me to the rpm I need? Any other basic pointers?
I was thinking to just build it out myself, but if there is a
confident sta
Jeff Lightner did NOT write that.
Jeff Lightner has worked with RHEL for quite some time and responded to
original author regarding packages available on RHEL 5.2.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Josh Mill
Rui Lopes wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Mark Andrews writes:
In message <49ac5d59.1010...@ruilopes.com>, Rui Lopes writes:
Hi,
Ben Bridges wrote:
[...]
You could try creating example.test as a forward zone in named.conf on
your sun server and specifying pl
hangan.org.tw is delegated to www.hangan.org.tw and mail.hangan.org.tw,
the glue records that are provided resolve both of those names to the
address 211.21.92.25. I believe BIND 8 considers a glue record to be
"good enough" to serve as an answer, so it returns the glue record. BIND
9, however,
In article ,
Michael Milligan wrote:
> Danny Mayer wrote:
> > Michael Milligan wrote:
> >> Just being more general. A URL is a HTTP URI... Google has plenty of
> >> explanations.
> >
> > That's nonsense. A URL was never just an HTTP URI. It's one example of
> > one but there have always been m
In article , Rui Lopes
wrote:
> Why isn't bind just following the "example.test. NS plesk.test." RR that
> is inside the "test." zone without removing the forwarders?
Because the point of configuring forwarders is to use them INSTEAD of
following NS records. Forwarders are generally used when
23 matches
Mail list logo
