RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. Because all the file sizes are different compaped to newest servers. #which named

Re: Strange results from dnssec-dsfromkey

2009-02-18 Thread Chris Thompson
I wrote: I don't understand the results I am getting from dnssec-dsfromkey (BIND 9.6.0-P1, Solaris 10_x86, Sun Studio 10 C compiler). [...] Does dnssec-dsfromkey behave properly for others? and Mark Andrews wrote: Looks like a silly bug that will be simple to fix. This is just a follow-u

RE: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread James Pratt
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On > Behalf Of Sven Eschenberg > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:28 PM > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Catch ALL Setup > > Dear list, > > I tried googling about a Catch-

Re: Bind Patch for Solaris 10

2009-02-18 Thread Milan Jurik
Hi, probably http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799867 with comment: - The description shows that the '-t chrootdir' option has been used. The error reported by named indicate the error. BIND 9.3.6 now uses poll(7d) and therefore the chroot environment needs to be modified to

Basic DNS Server Setup

2009-02-18 Thread atbigelow
I have ventured into the world of trying to setup my own DNS server for a domain of mine (henceforth referred to as "mydomain.com"). I have a small Linux server setup in my office that I do all my web development work on and contains numerous other daemons such as Subversion, MySQL, etc. The IP lea

Re: NOTAUTH on dynamic zone update

2009-02-18 Thread Benedikt Gollatz
Mark Andrews wrote: > In message , Benedikt Gollatz writes: >> Unfortunately this doesn't work. When running nsupdate, I get a "failed: >> not authoritative for update zone (NOTAUTH)" error in my server log file, >> and no updating is done. > > The zone section in the update message does NOT match

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: > As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server > in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early > version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. > Because all the

Re: Basic DNS Server Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, atbigelow wrote: > After entering input mode for nslookup: > > mydomain.com > > Says it can't find mydomain.com: REFUSED. Looking into /var/log/syslog > I find numerous SERVFAIL and REFUSED RCODEs. And what did named log about attempting to load that zone? Maybe your n

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
I checked and there isnt any rndc.conf... /var/named # /var/named #find / -name rndc.conf /var/named # /var/named # /var/named # And "which named" points to /usr/local/sbin/named (there isnt any other named either) and "rndc stats" dumps stats as follows 4:00pm

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
#/usr/local/sbin/named -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 /var/named #which named /usr/local/sbin/named /var/named #which rndc /usr/local/sbin/rndc /var/named -Original Message- From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknol

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Maybe you need to fully stop the process and restart it. (Maybe old named is still running even though you replaced the binary.) ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Thomas Schulz
In article , Cihan Subasi \(Garanti Teknoloji\) wrote: >#/usr/local/sbin/named -v >BIND 9.5.0-P2 > /var/named >#which named >/usr/local/sbin/named > /var/named >#which rndc >/usr/local/sbin/rndc > /var/named Try 'rndc status' and see what version is reported in that output. >-Original Mess

Re: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Stacey Jonathan Marshall
On 02/18/09 05:19, Mark Andrews wrote: $ORIGIN . @ 0 SOA ... @ 0 NS ... * 0 A 1.2.3.4 Just be careful of what you wish for, don't come back here saying that your resolver search path is no longer working ;-) To explain, lets say you use the above in example.c

Re: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Sven Eschenberg
The problem I am actually facing is, that I don't want to use it in a specific zone, but basicly in every imaginable zone. No matter which Query comes in, always respong with IP X. A normal wildcard setup for a specific zone is pretty obvious and straight forward. The search path wouldn't ma

Re: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:19 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > $ORIGIN . > @ 0 SOA ... > @ 0 NS ... > * 0 A 1.2.3.4 That may be too minimal. I found I needed a few couple of extra wildcard records. $ORIGIN . @ IN SOA . bit-bucket.ucd.ie. (

Re: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Robert Stucke
Just create your own root zone and add the wildcard entry in there. zone "." in { type master; file "db.root"; allow-update { None; }; allow-query { Any; }; }; Rob On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Sven Eschenberg wrote: > The problem I am actually facing is,

Re: Unexpected error question

2009-02-18 Thread Stacey Jonathan Marshall
On 02/05/09 16:04, Cherney John-CJC030 wrote: Yes, I normally use svcadm disable dns/server to stop named. Also, I've modified the dns/server stop method from the usual "kill:" to "/usr/sbin/rndc stop". I did that because I want to make sure the cache gets written to the db files, which an rndc s

Re: Basic DNS Server Setup

2009-02-18 Thread atbigelow
On 18 Feb, 07:07, "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, atbigelow wrote: > > After entering input mode for nslookup: > > >     mydomain.com > > > Says it can't find mydomain.com: REFUSED. Looking into /var/log/syslog > > I find numerous SERVFAIL and REFUSED RCODEs. > > And what did named

query an external nameserver doubt

2009-02-18 Thread Nuno Ribeiro
Hi all, Is it possible to send a query to a external nameserver that can be a CNAME for a record located in other nameserver zone where we are authoritive? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, -- Nuno Ribeiro ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.is

Re: Catch ALL Setup

2009-02-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <1234976434.12081.26.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:19 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > $ORIGIN . > > @ 0 SOA ... > > @ 0 NS ... > > * 0 A 1.2.3.4 > > That may be too minimal. > I found I needed a few couple of extra wildcard recor

Re: query an external nameserver doubt

2009-02-18 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Nuno Ribeiro wrote: > Is it possible to send a query to a external nameserver that can be a CNAME > for a record located in other nameserver zone where we are authoritive? It's hard to parse this. Could you give an example of what you're asking about? -- Barry Margolin, bar...@a