I have a question regarding views, and the decisions that can be based
on network scenario. I'm not entirely sure whether it's possible to
provide resolution for the scenario I describe, but I thought I'd ask
the question.
I have a new small environment of machines (Unix – mainly Linux) that
need
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:19:20PM -0800,
Prabhat Rana wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
> Is it possible to have more than one hosts assigned as SOA in a
> given zone file?
There is no reason to do so.
> Currently I have host1 as master and host2 configured as slave for
> x.host.com.
So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change even if SOA
in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer will resume even when
host1 is down?
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Barry Margolin wrote:
> From: Barry Margolin
> Subject: Re: Multiple SOA
> To: comp-protocols-dns-b
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:44:30AM -0800,
Prabhat Rana wrote
a message of 68 lines which said:
> So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change
> even if SOA in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer
> will resume even when host1 is down?
May I give an advice?
In article , JAFFO
wrote:
> I have a question regarding views, and the decisions that can be based
> on network scenario. I'm not entirely sure whether it's possible to
> provide resolution for the scenario I describe, but I thought I'd ask
> the question.
>
> I have a new small environment of
In article ,
Prabhat Rana wrote:
> So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change even if
> SOA in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer will resume even
> when host1 is down?
Yes. When there are multiple masters listed, the slave tries to
transfer from ALL
6 matches
Mail list logo
