Hello!
(sorry for my trash-english)
I have a problem and finally i found out a "solution", but also i read
the thread about multiple PTRs are not recommended.
My configuration:
Have a router, two computers behind it. comp1 has webserver (no
mailserver), comp2 has mailserver (no webserver),
We want to buy a unified root domain,
but they say we can not use the domain only one word.
like
ozgurs
so that it opens
http://ozgurs
but we have to use a connected word to this TLD, like
example.ozgurs
here, my quetion comes! :)
i bet with my friend that we can not use the domain itself.
NOW
Hello,
I can also confirm this for BIND 9.5.0-P2 for DNSSec enabled resolvers
using DLV (an ISP environment, arout 500-600 queries per second according to
BIND query log).
After several hours of operation, the server stopped answering on certain
cached records in signed zones (no packets ca
Unifiedroot is a scam. I suggest you do some due diligence on them before
you pay them any money. Let them know I gave you this heads up - I'm sure
they will appreciate it.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, ozgurs wrote:
> We want to buy a unified root domain,
> but they sa
Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going to
use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I cannot find
how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the forwarders that are
set? Thanks in advance.
T
_
On Jan 15, 2009, at 6:33 AM, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
My configuration:
Have a router, two computers behind it. comp1 has webserver (no
mailserver), comp2 has mailserver (no webserver), have one IPv4
address, and few IPv6 addresses. The IPv4 address configured on the
router, DNAT-ing the TCPv
Hi ,
I need small help regarding this issue.
I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
below code snapshot where the problem occured.
status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
DSA_SIG_free(dsasig);
if (status == 0)
Hi ,
I need small help regarding this issue.
I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
below code snapshot where the problem occured.
status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
DSA_SIG_free(dsasig);
if (status == 0)
At Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:52:37 -0600,
"Thilanka Samarasekera" wrote:
> Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going to
> use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I cannot find
> how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the forwarders that a
I had the same issue on one of my caching resolvers just yesterday for
the first time. This is one of the lowest utilized servers out of 6
that are all on identical hardware and identical versions of BIND
(9.4.3).
Jan 14 17:46:38 wdmdc-dns-dts2 named[1415]: [ID 873579 daemon.crit]
name.c
Hi ozgurs,
can you give me your address so I can settup a zone for you?
e.g.
ozgurs A 127.0.0.1
Then you have the proof that it is working.
Please have a look at
http://www.cesidianroot.net/
to find how to settup your DNS for the test.
If you have a dynamic ip address things are a li
At Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:57:17 -0600,
Rich Goodson wrote:
> I had the same issue on one of my caching resolvers just yesterday for
> the first time. This is one of the lowest utilized servers out of 6
> that are all on identical hardware and identical versions of BIND
> (9.4.3).
>
> Jan 14
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122239920822324&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122243068905656&w=2
We upgraded to 9.5.0-P1 when the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability was announced
and have had intermittent issues with SERVFAIL problems for some DSL modems
that don't properly fail over to a seconda
> Is this intermittent SERVFAIL issue resolved in 9.5.1-P1?
9.5.1 has many improvements that solve various SERVFAIL issues seen in the
9.5.0-P1/P2 code and includes /dev/poll, kqueue, or epoll on supported
systems.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-user
Thilanka Samarasekera wrote:
> Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going
> to use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I
> cannot find how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the
> forwarders that are set? Thanks in advance.
>
> T
You
Lalvani, Hiro wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I need small help regarding this issue.
>
> I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
> below code snapshot where the problem occured.
>
>
> status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
> DSA_SIG
This is slightly OT, I am not able to resolve some domains from a server
hosted at thePlanet (Centos-5.2 with bind 9.3.3 )
-
[r...@smtpout1 ~]# dig @localhost bsnl.in
; <<>> DiG 9.3.3rc2 <<>> @localhost bsnl.in
; (1 server found)
;; global optio
Lalvani, Hiro wrote:
> Could any one of help me, regarding this fix in BIND 9.2. I am unable to find
> function same function in BIND 9.2 or could any one just share the
> corresponding related the code architecture between BIND9.2 and BIND 9.3.
http://oldwww.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.2.9
18 matches
Mail list logo
