On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Lothar Behrens wrote:
> Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: starting BIND 9.5.0-P2 -t /var/
> lib/named -u named
Chrooting to /var/lib/named
> Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: the working directory is not
> writable
>
> My working directory is /var/lib/named and the per
On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Lothar Behrens wrote:
Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: starting BIND 9.5.0-P2 -t /var/
lib/named -u named
Chrooting to /var/lib/named
Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: the working directory is not
writable
My wo
Is there a option for use in named.conf to force recursion ?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Guys,
I am trying to upgrade BIND 9.2.3 to 9.5.1-P1.
Does anyone have a matrix on how to go about doing it?
I need to do this ASAP so as to prevent/aid in DNS cache poisoning.
Please point me in the right direction or give me advise as to how to proceed.
> To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org>
I know that by default recursion is yes (recursion yes; ). I would
like to know if it is possible to enforce recursion for all the DNS
queries going out of the host on which the named is configured.
Thanks
Anand
On Jan 12, 2:55 pm, anand.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a option for use in named
If you don't host any zones on the server, then it would always recurse, no?
The server will always answer for zones it's authoritative for, as far as my
understanding.
You might need to explain more about your confguration/desired outcome than you
currently have.
Todd.
-Original Message
Clarifications below:
Here is one context:
What if I delegate a zone to a nameserver which is configured as a
cache-only?
thanks
Anand
On Jan 12, 5:06 pm, "Todd Snyder" wrote:
> If you don't host any zones on the server, then it would always recurse, no?
>
> The server will always answer for z
In message <38a5da31-c967-4558-8659-ffaec0e43...@s9g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
Lothar Behrens writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have read some postings here in the group that states to set the
> group writability for the named directory.
> But it still keeps logging the error message from the topic.
>
> Log:
In message , Johan Ihren
writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been
> completely unsuccessful in getting an authenticated response from a
> 9.6.0 recursive server with trusted keys correctly configured.
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been
completely unsuccessful in getting an authenticated response from a
9.6.0 recursive server with trusted keys correctly configured
Chiesa Stefano wrote:
> Hi all.
> Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
>
> I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
> years.
> Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
> I installed it but when I try to start the service the system says:
>
> Event Type: Error
> Even
In article , anand.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know that by default recursion is yes (recursion yes; ). I would
> like to know if it is possible to enforce recursion for all the DNS
> queries going out of the host on which the named is configured.
Do you mean that when it sends out queries, it sho
In message <088512ac-625e-4a72-aa90-65c73fb8b...@johani.org>, Johan Ihren
writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:49, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >> I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been
> >> completely unsuccessful
13 matches
Mail list logo
