We have moved a zone from UltraDNS to our DNS server 1 week ago and it
is still not showing us as authority. Can anyone help me as to why this
might be happening and how to fix it? I have included a dig below using
a public dns server (4.2.2.1) and our dns server (69.25.129.117) where
is shows no a
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation
which is in the bullet list as
Documentation and external links (Reference manuals, FAQ, etc)
on https://www.isc.org/software/bind
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Haneda writ
es:
> Very nice, I am also cc'ing webmaster@ as per the email.
>
>
I recently moved our DNS from QuickDNS to BIND 9.5.0-P2 on OSX.
Everything appears to be responding correctly when the server is
queried, however our secondary is not updating (secondary is hosted by
another provider) and the TLD's keep showing the old ns IP after a
week. I deleted the zon
On Nov 14 2008, blrmaani wrote:
I use BIND 9.2 on Linux.
Horribly old. But I doubt whether anything has changed in the ACL logic
since then.
I was experimenting with a feature to allow
dynamic updates based on
BOTH the following:
1. Secret key ( TSIG )
2. Subnet.
Well, first part solved. I forgot to change the IP address of our
nameserver at the registrar. Secondary is still not updating though.
Jeff J.
On Nov 16, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Jeff Justice wrote:
I recently moved our DNS from QuickDNS to BIND 9.5.0-P2 on OSX.
Everything appears to be respondi
Can you run "dig @MASTER_DNS_SERVER_ADDR YOUR_ZONE axfr" and get
anything? Can you do this from the slave? If not, you have zone
transfers disabled in your configuration. Your clip of your
configuration would say that transfers are allowed but without seeing
the whole thing we can't say
acl address_allow { 10/8; };
acl address_reject { !address_allow; any; };
allow-update { !reject; key ""; };
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Buxton
writes:
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:40 PM, blrmaani wrote:
> > All,
> > I use BIND 9.2 on Linux. I was expe
On Nov 14 2008, blrmaani wrote:
I use BIND 9.2 on Linux.
Horribly old. But I doubt whether anything has changed in the ACL logic
since then.
I was experimenting with a feature to allow
dynamic updates based on
BOTH the following:
1. Secret key ( TSIG )
2. Subnet.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Chris Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 14 2008, blrmaani wrote:
>
> I use BIND 9.2 on Linux.
>>
>
> Horribly old. But I doubt whether anything has changed in the ACL logic
> since then.
>
> I was experimenting with a feature
Seems there were two problems. Part one, my failure to update the IP
address to our new NS at the registrar. Duh! Second, the serial
number on the secondary was higher than the master. How it got that
way, I'm not sure, but I suspect it is because I was using incremental
and the seconda
Can anyone point me to a good tutorial/explanation (preferably in
newbie language of course) of how an SPF record works and how to
create a correct one?
Jeff J.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
On Nov 16, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
allow-update { !{!10/8;any;}; key update-key; };
Wouldn't this still permit any client on the 10/8 subnet to update
the zones?
No. It says:
1. Deny anyone who isn't in 10/8.
2. Allow anyone using this key.
The first item in the list
http://www.openspf.org/
They have a wizard you could use for SPF
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 20:45 -0600, Jeff Justice wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a good tutorial/explanation (preferably in
> newbie language of course) of how an SPF record works and how to
> create a correct one?
>
> Jeff J.
Jeff Justice wrote:
Can anyone point me to a good tutorial/explanation (preferably in
newbie language of course) of how an SPF record works and how to
create a correct one?
http://www.openspf.org/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
