I've double checked our nameserver config and there shouldn't be any stub
involved when resolving this domain, we don't have forwarder configured.
After flush the cache or the cache expires itself(the ttl is short), bind
almost always hit another server and works, we have 9 named resolvers,
anytim
Hillary,
I suspect there's more going on behind the scenes than just what your
tcpdump shows here. Can you please post your named.conf file so we
can all see if there are any forwarders, stub zones, etc. involved
here?
Second thing: after you flush your cache, does the same behavior
persist, or
Thanks John, I've changed the resolver-query-timeout from default 10 to 30
seconds thought my nameserver should have enough time to query at least one
other nameservers of production.tacc.utexas.edu before gets timed out. But
still it stuck with the one that's not working instead of trying other
na
Hi Hillary,
By default, BIND will return SERVFAIL to the client if it can't
complete the full iteration process within 10 seconds. This is
controllable by the "resolver-query-timeout" parameter. As for why
your recursive server doesn't just try elsewhere, it _will_, but it
assumes that it's quer
Also should mention that our BIND is 9.9.8-P4, what confuses me here is
that the listed nameserver (129.114.13.18) is lame and our nameserver (
192.168.1.100) can't get any responses from it(see tcpdump above), why our
nameserver try other listed NS servers instead sending 'ServFail' to the
client
We've been seeing sporadic failure of resolve this name
web1.production.tacc.utexas.edu from our nameserver.
There are 6 NS listed for domain production.tacc.utexas.edu, two of the six
don't seem to work(dc1.production.tacc.utexas.edu 129.114.13.17 and
dc2.production.tacc.utexas.edu 129.114.13.18)
6 matches
Mail list logo