10 ; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local";
It is at this point, IMNSHO, that anybody attempting to configure a software of
the complexity of a BIND name server should begin to ask themselves what the
'include' directive might actually be. It is then, that said person would
probably begin looking
Hello folks ^^)
First I'm new to this list so greatings to all of you :)
like my email lets know I'm french, in France :)
Now; the problem said in subject :
I've setup a Debian 12 server (not in production yet) and got strange
problems with the installed bind9.18.28-1 deb12u2-Debian (extended
Hello Ondřej ^^)
Le 12/11/2024 à 18:12, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
You haven’t pasted the contents of the include files, but most likely it’s the
contents of /etc/bind/named.conf.options that are missing the semicolon at the
end, but the parser only complains at the next directive which is located
You haven’t pasted the contents of the include files, but most likely it’s the
contents of /etc/bind/named.conf.options that are missing the semicolon at the
end, but the parser only complains at the next directive which is located in
the main config file.
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My worki
Hi Bob,
> I tend to distrust "CPU(30%)" if it is averaged over more than one
> cpu. Could you run "top" and hit the number "1" so that it shows each
> cpu separately? With 8 cpu's, "30%" could be one cpu at 100% and others
> lower, where the one cpu at 100% is your bottleneck.
I checked that w
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Marc Richter
wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
>
> No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
> (mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> >
> > # ndd -get /dev/ip \
Hi Dennis,
> Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
(mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> # ndd -get /dev/ip \? | grep "read"
> # ndd -get /dev/tcp \? | grep "read"
>
That, as w
On 06/29/2017 12:52 PM, Marc Richter wrote:
Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up
Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up to 32768 sockets
We only have about 1.500 qu
Hi Ben,
thanks for the answer.
Yeah, I think you are right. I see a lot of udpInOverflows on the system,
which suggest that the receive buffer is too small indeed.
Is there any kind of recommendation or best-practice advice what the
buffers should ideally be set to on Solaris ?
I did search the
Have you checked deeper at the OS level? I have seen on Linux DNS servers
silent drops of queries on very busy servers that were exhausting UDP
receive buffers.
On Jun 28, 2017 10:26 AM, "Marc Richter"
wrote:
Hi,
we have a setup here consisting of a recursive DNS server and two
monitoring serve
Hi,
we have a setup here consisting of a recursive DNS server and two
monitoring servers. The monitoring servers sent a test query to the DNS
server once every two minutes to check if it is answering properly.
We now have the problems that these test queries are timing out from time
to time, (cor
In article ,
"Gordon A. Lang" wrote:
> Making some assumptions about where your dig queries are being sent, I would
> say it looks like the Squid is simply failing its DNS lookup (for whatever
> reason), then the Squid system is retaining a 5 minute negative cache. If
> this is true, then th
system fail
on that one lookups but (presumably) succeeds on others?
--
Gordon A. Lang
--
From: "John E.P. Hynes"
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 8:55 AM
To: "Barry Margolin"
Cc: ;
Subject: Re: Strange problem with a query delet
On 08/24/2013 12:46 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <52177d81.8020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 8/22/2013 12:55 PM, jo...@primebuchholz.com wrote:
Greetings All,
First of all, I apologize if this is out of place - I'm having a very
strange
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <52177d81.8020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> > On 8/22/2013 12:55 PM, jo...@primebuchholz.com wrote:
> > > Greetings All,
> > >
> > > First of all, I apologize if this is out of place - I'm having a very
> > > strange issue that is either a
In message <52177d81.8020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> On 8/22/2013 12:55 PM, jo...@primebuchholz.com wrote:
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > First of all, I apologize if this is out of place - I'm having a very
> > strange issue that is either a problem with bind itself, or at least,
> > aff
On 8/22/2013 12:55 PM, jo...@primebuchholz.com wrote:
Greetings All,
First of all, I apologize if this is out of place - I'm having a very
strange issue that is either a problem with bind itself, or at least,
affecting it. Summary:
For only ONE address, whenever I attempt to access it through
Greetings All,
First of all, I apologize if this is out of place - I'm having a very
strange issue that is either a problem with bind itself, or at least,
affecting it. Summary:
For only ONE address, whenever I attempt to access it through my squid
proxy, the record disappears from DNS, and t
to res=
> olve name, MX etc...and my DNS slaves=20
What does "dig +trace treesfresh.net" return? Similarly for the others.
Note dig +trace does not follow CNAMES so you will need to restart the
queries the canonical name.
What do "tcpdump -n -s 0 port 53" show when you make a
com
cdn2.example2.com 3600 IN CNAME cdn3.example2.com
cdn3.example2.com 3600 IN A 1.2.3.4
Thanks a lot guys,
--WS
--- On Mon, 2/8/10, W S wrote:
From: W S
Subject: strange problem
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 3:44 PM
Folks,
When I try to get an IP addr
/8/10, W S wrote:
From: W S
Subject: strange problem
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 3:44 PM
Folks,
When I try to get an IP address for some sub-site/domain, let's say
cdn2.example.com --- I'm getting errors, BUT when I query
Google's DNS
--- On Mon, 2/8/10, W S wrote:
From: W S
Subject: Re: strange problem
To: "Jeremy C. Reed"
Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 4:24 PM
$ dig @8.8.8.8 cdn2.totalporn.com
cdn2.totalporn.com. 3600 IN CNAME wac.1a2a.edgecastcdn.net.
wac.1a2a.edgecastcdn.net
Please provide real names.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Folks,
When I try to get an IP address for some sub-site/domain, let's say
cdn2.example.com --- I'm getting errors, BUT when I query
Google's DNS servers I'm getting an IP address:
dig @8.8.8.8 cdn2.example.com
cdn2.example.com 3600 IN CNAME cdn2.example2.com
cdn2.example2.com 3600 IN CNAME cdn
Eric Langheinrich wrote:
I'm running into a strange problem and am hoping someone might be able to
give me at least some direction regarding what to look at.
I have bind setup and the name server on my box. /etc/resolve.conf lists
127.0.0.1 as the name server. Bind is authoritative
I'm running into a strange problem and am hoping someone might be able to
give me at least some direction regarding what to look at.
I have bind setup and the name server on my box. /etc/resolve.conf lists
127.0.0.1 as the name server. Bind is authoritative for a single domain (for
int
27 matches
Mail list logo
