Re: sort list and view

2011-07-20 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 7/20/2011 1:15 AM, AMANI M. BIN SUWAIF wrote: Hi, The problem is that fail-over between A records is not standard and might/might not work with various SIP clients. On the other hand SRV in my opinion has been designed with that in mind, that's why the additional complexity with 2 SRV r

Re: sort list and view

2011-07-19 Thread AMANI M. BIN SUWAIF
Hi, The problem is that fail-over between A records is not standard and might/might not work with various SIP clients. On the other hand SRV in my opinion has been designed with that in mind, that's why the additional complexity with 2 SRV records. Thanks & Regards, *Amani* On 7/20/2011

Re: sort list and view

2011-07-19 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 7/18/2011 11:42 PM, AMANI MOHAMED BIN SUWAIF wrote: Hi, I have the below scenario _TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV1005060primary-sbg.example.com _TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV2005060 secondary-sbg.example.com I have 2 IP ranges and 2 SBGs host, my intention is for cl

sort list and view

2011-07-18 Thread AMANI MOHAMED BIN SUWAIF
Hi, I have the below scenario _TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV1005060primary-sbg.example.com _TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV2005060secondary-sbg.example.com I have 2 IP ranges and 2 SBGs host, my intention is for client in IP range1 primary-sbg INA1.1.1.1 seco