Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2010-03-02 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <1d8c9a4471119a40bd574f9d8d464ae30ea85...@xch60ykf.rim.net>, "Todd S nyder" writes: > Good day, > > We've started seeing this bug on a couple servers, but I see no mention > of it being fixed, so I don't know what version I should upgrade to. > Nor can I find anything that lays out the

Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2010-03-02 Thread Todd Snyder
Good day, We've started seeing this bug on a couple servers, but I see no mention of it being fixed, so I don't know what version I should upgrade to. Nor can I find anything that lays out the impact/risk of this. Does anyone know the status of this bug? Thanks! From: bind-users-boun...@lists

Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2009-07-31 Thread Le Vu
I have just reported this bug. Ticket number is [ISC-Bugs #20030]. Regards, Vu On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Paul E wrote: > > Le Vu, > > lev> BTW, what can I do to help debugging this problem? If it doesn't > lev> involve with programming I will try. > > Submit this to ISC by emailing bind9-b

Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2009-07-31 Thread Paul E
Le Vu, lev> BTW, what can I do to help debugging this problem? If it doesn't lev> involve with programming I will try. Submit this to ISC by emailing bind9-b...@isc.org. Thanks! ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.or

Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2009-07-31 Thread Le Vu
It happens on all of our DNS servers. We have 6 servers run RHEL 4.4 or Centos 5. This error appears more frequently on servers with high load. I saw the same problem with BIND 9.6. That is the reason why I stay with 9.4.2 as long as I can. Performance is acceptable with 9.4.2 P2. I will try the w

Re: socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2009-07-31 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:16:47 +0700, Le Vu wrote: > I have updated BIND from 9.4.2-P2 to 9.4.3-P3 to mitigate the Dynamic Update > DOS attack. I have noted a lot of errors from socket.c (which I have never > seen before with v9.4.2) > > Jul 30 06:25:18 DNS1 named[2]: socket.c:4524: unexpected

socket.c:4524: unexpected error in BIND 9.4.3 P3

2009-07-30 Thread Le Vu
Hi, I have updated BIND from 9.4.2-P2 to 9.4.3-P3 to mitigate the Dynamic Update DOS attack. I have noted a lot of errors from socket.c (which I have never seen before with v9.4.2) Jul 30 06:25:18 DNS1 named[2]: socket.c:4524: unexpected error: Jul 30 06:25:18 DNS1 named[2]: 22/Invalid arg