Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-15 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Michael McNally wrote: > On 9/9/11 1:34 PM, TMK wrote: > > > > On Sep 9, 2011 10:28 PM, "TMK" > > wrote: > > > > > > On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: We have find the reason why our > > network analyzer report that bind is responding to a.roo

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-15 Thread Michael McNally
On 9/9/11 1:34 PM, TMK wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2011 10:28 PM, "TMK" > wrote: > > > > On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: We have find the reason why our > network analyzer report that bind is responding to a.root-server.net > in 30 sec. You may have noticed this already, but in

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: >We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is >responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. Oh, does gmail rewrap lines in incoming messages? In the same stupid way as Outlook does? Can you please turn it off? does your server respond to a

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 9, 2011 10:28 PM, "TMK" wrote: > > On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: >We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is >responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. > > does your server respond to a.root-servers.net, or does > a.root-servers.netrespond to your BIND? A.root-s

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. does your server respond to a.root-servers.net, or does a.root-servers.net respond to your BIND? Cause all the packets are having the same source por

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 8, 2011 1:31 PM, "TMK" wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, TMK wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK wrote: > >> > >>> Message: 1 > >>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 > >> > >>> From:

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-08 Thread TMK
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, TMK wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK wrote: >> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 >> >>> From: TMK >>> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries >>> To: bind-users@li

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-06 Thread TMK
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK wrote: > >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 > >> From: TMK >> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries >> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org >> Message-ID: >> >>   >> Content-Type: t

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-03 Thread TMK
> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 > From: TMK > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Sep 2, 2011 9:48 AM, "TMK&

Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
From: "Leonard Mills" Date: Aug 31, 2011 8:15 PM Subject: Re: slow non-cached quries To: "TMK" ;; Received 738 bytes from 192.112.36.4#53(G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 3133 ms That pretty much is your delay. Look to your intermediate network segments, especially any smart devic

Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-02 Thread TMK
On Sep 2, 2011 9:48 AM, "TMK" wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Leonard Mills" > Date: Aug 31, 2011 8:15 PM > Subject: Re: slow non-cached quries > To: "TMK" > > ;; Received 738 bytes from 192.112.36.4#53(G.ROO

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-08-31 Thread TMK
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:26 AM, TMK wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: >> >> In message >> , >>  TMK writes: >>> Dears, >>> >>> Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server >>> have slow response time for the non-cached entries. >>> >

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-08-30 Thread TMK
Tamer Mohamed NOC engineer LinkdotNet On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message > , >  TMK writes: >> Dears, >> >> Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server >> have slow response time for the non-cached entries. >> >> I have run dig w

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-08-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , TMK writes: > Dears, > > Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server > have slow response time for the non-cached entries. > > I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace >

slow non-cached quries

2011-08-29 Thread TMK
Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have slow response time for the non-cached entries. I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd .