Re: slave transfer problems

2009-04-30 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Scott Haneda wrote: > On Apr 29, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: > > > In article , > > Scott Haneda wrote: > >> > >> > >> like my machine, .14 is refusing their refresh request. Do I need to > >> allow-recursion for their NS0? > > > > No, you shouldn't need allow-recursi

Re: slave transfer problems

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Haneda
On Apr 29, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article , Scott Haneda wrote: like my machine, .14 is refusing their refresh request. Do I need to allow-recursion for their NS0? No, you shouldn't need allow-recursion. You might need allow-query, if you're not allowing to all.

Re: slave transfer problems

2009-04-29 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Scott Haneda wrote: > I have been having some long standing issues with my secondary > provider that I would like to learn how to solve, and who needs to > look to solve the errors. When I make an update, it seems hit or miss > as to how long before I see it hit the secondary

slave transfer problems

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Haneda
I have been having some long standing issues with my secondary provider that I would like to learn how to solve, and who needs to look to solve the errors. When I make an update, it seems hit or miss as to how long before I see it hit the secondary. Apparently they have a server at xx.xx.