Dear Matus / Tony, I understand your point.
It is good practice to be authoritative for non routing prefixes so
queries are not sended outside.
About RFC 1918 , I understand it is necessary to provide reverse mapping
for non - internet routing prefixes as described here:
http://archive.oreilly.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> you should declare at least RFC 1918/3330/5735 reverse zones, to prevent
> from forwarding queries to root servers.
Up-to-date named has these built in.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
South Fitzroy: Westerly veering northerly 4 or 5, occasionall
On 06.07.15 16:39, Leandro wrote:
3)Does it have any drawbacks no declaring any zone file in the long term?
you should declare at least RFC 1918/3330/5735 reverse zones, to prevent
from forwarding queries to root servers.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
W
ilability and other security benefits of having data local
to the clients. Restricting replication is a sledgehammer "solution" to the
information-disclosure issue.
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc
Hi , guys after reading some documentation about setting my master /
slave dns cache cluster, I stil have some doubts.
Im setting a master / slave dns cache cluster to provide dns service to
internal users on my company having redundancy.
Here the questions:
1)If Im not authoritative for any
5 matches
Mail list logo
