rted in that output.
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM
>To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
>Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
>
>On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Ciha
Maybe you need to fully stop the process and restart it. (Maybe old named
is still running even though you replaced the binary.)
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Teknoloji)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
> As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2
> server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have
> an early vers
From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM
To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
> As you see below the files are dated 15 au
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
> As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server
> in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early
> version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats.
> Because all the
age-
From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a
rndc.conf f
Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a
rndc.conf file.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-
From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji); 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Cc: 'c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk'
Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
There may be more than one "named" binary in your path. Y
isc.org
> Cc: c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
>
> I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same but
> versions are matching...
>
> short
>
> --
> #ls -la
> total 48166
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root other
ers Mailing List
Subject: Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
>When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am
>getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in
>very short format
>(7 l
On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting
two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format
(7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What
could
Hi,
When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting
two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format
(7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What
could be the difference on both? thank you
SHORT
+++
12 matches
Mail list logo
