Re: rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-06-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:21:08 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > "rndc flushnamespace" / "rndc flushname -recurse" would have to > > walk the tree and remove each entry. This can be time consuming. > > is this planned feature or does it already work somewhere? This is a planned (or

Re: rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-06-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> In message , Chris > Thom > pson writes: > > Arising out of today's little accident with the "de" TLD ... > > > > Am I right in thinking that "rndc flushname de" flushes only entries for > > that specific name, and not for names in the tree *under* "de"? It would > > be rather useful to have th

Re: rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-05-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Chris Thom pson writes: > Arising out of today's little accident with the "de" TLD ... > > Am I right in thinking that "rndc flushname de" flushes only entries for > that specific name, and not for names in the tree *under* "de"? It would > be rather useful to have the latter facilit

rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-05-12 Thread Chris Thompson
Arising out of today's little accident with the "de" TLD ... Am I right in thinking that "rndc flushname de" flushes only entries for that specific name, and not for names in the tree *under* "de"? It would be rather useful to have the latter facility (short of flushing the whole cache). Of cour