> Type forward? Really? I didn't expect that to come from someone at ISC.
D'oh, embarrassed now.
> Use 'type stub' instead, with a masters statement rather than a
> forwarders statement.
Chris is correct, both options work, stub is better.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consorti
On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> Then configure the
> zones as "type forward", with "forwarders" pointing to the authoritative
> server(s) for your zones. The resolver will then forward queries for those
> names to the authoritative servers, and validate the responses.
Type forwar
In message <20130210225742.ga9...@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org>, "Michael
W. Lucas" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to set up a private trust anchor for internal-only
> zones with BIND 9.9?
>
> I have some local and RFC1918 zones that I'd like to
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:26:27PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > Is there a way to set up a private trust anchor for internal-only
> > zones with BIND 9.9?
> >
> > I have some local and RFC1918 zones
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Is there a way to set up a private trust anchor for internal-only
> zones with BIND 9.9?
>
> I have some local and RFC1918 zones that I'd like to secure. It seems
> I should be able to configure a private
Hi,
Is there a way to set up a private trust anchor for internal-only
zones with BIND 9.9?
I have some local and RFC1918 zones that I'd like to secure. It seems
I should be able to configure a private trust anchor and use that key
to sign these zones.
I've found, related docs, like dr
6 matches
Mail list logo