reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 15. 12. 2022, at 21:47, Marcus Kool wrote:
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> yeah, I was kinda expecting "no guarantees", but isn't the plugin_version()
> function a good method candidate to enforce compatibility?
> I mean,
Hi Ondrej,
yeah, I was kinda expecting "no guarantees", but isn't the plugin_version()
function a good method candidate to enforce compatibility?
I mean, isn't increasing NS_PLUGIN_VERSION when a (plugin visible) data
structure changes, a good way to enforce that only co
ugin for named and was wondering what the policy behind
> the usage of plugin_version() is and what kind of compatibility check it
> intends to perform.
>
> It is common for plugins to use query_ctx_t and its members fname, view,
> client (client.message, client.query) etc.
> Si
Hi,
I have written a plugin for named and was wondering what the policy behind the
usage of plugin_version() is and what kind of compatibility check it intends to
perform.
It is common for plugins to use query_ctx_t and its members fname, view, client
(client.message, client.query) etc
4 matches
Mail list logo
