On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
"master", and one that has all the zones as "slave". When the
master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the z
Monday, February 14, 2011 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: multi-master with mysql backend
> FWIW, I feel compelled to chime in -- for those who haven't already begun
> to filter out this thread.
>
> We have many thousands of records (internally) in hundreds of zones,
> mostly dyna
ems
extremely insane.
Ah. There, I feel much better now having said that.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mitchell
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: multi-master with mysql backend
I'd keep two
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
>I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
"master", and one that has all the zones as "slave". When the master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the zones, edits the SOA to make
that server the MNAME
nces+mike.mitchell=sas@lists.isc.org] on behalf of
> Bill Larson [wllarso@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2011 10:39 AM
> *To:* fddi
> *Cc:* bind-users@lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Re: multi-master with mysql backend
>
> On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>
February 14, 2011 10:39 AM
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: multi-master with mysql backend
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services for
examp
e comparing BIND using various backend systems,
including MySQL. This can be found at http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/perf_tests.html
, which is part of the work that the people that developed DLZ for
BIND. The standard BIND server could provide 16,000 queries per
second. The same BIND server u
I will consider very much your hints. Thank you for your point of view and I
would like to try What you suggested.
Riccardo
On 14/feb/2011, at 00:24, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>> I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
>
> It isn't a matter o
On 2/14/11 4:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the qu
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>>
>> I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
>
> It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
> refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying to
help you, my feeling is that you have decided that you wan
n the two servers
and the mysql solution looks safer to me. You do not have to rsync
anything, just have mysql properly configured.
Riccardo
On 2/12/11 11:33 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:
I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one o
On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:
I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one of the two servers dies, the other keeps running with up to
date informations, and can also be updated wit new informations. When
the other server comes up again it will automatically
I understand you,
but the advantage of having mysql backend is that if one of the two
servers dies, the other keeps
running with up to date informations, and can also be updated wit new
informations. When the other server comes up again
it will automatically sync itself using mysql replica
On 2/9/2011 7:12 PM, fddi wrote:
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind-mysql driver.
everything works except that nsupdate will no longer work.
is this normal ??
requests sent for adding a RR using nsupdate are ignored by named when
using mysqldb backend
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind-mysql driver.
everything works except that nsupdate will no longer work.
is this normal ??
requests sent for adding a RR using nsupdate are ignored by named when
using mysqldb backend
while they are honoured and
>>> I need really something very simple:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
>> Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
>>
>>
>I need to be able to update the nameserver even if one of the two
>masters is down, I need this
>for High Avaliability purpos
which must be
always avaliable... that's it nothing complicate.
Yup.
now I coudl succesfully build my own bind RPM for CentOS with mysql backend
support.
I simply used mysql-bind driver patches
Ah, but now, suddenly, it *is* complicated...
Seriously, unless you have some pathological use cas
services which must be
> always avaliable... that's it nothing complicate.
Yup.
>
> now I coudl succesfully build my own bind RPM for CentOS with mysql backend
> support.
> I simply used mysql-bind driver patches
Ah, but now, suddenly, it *is* complicated...
Seriously, un
2011/2/9 Torinthiel :
> Or, if you need to be able to modify records from both servers than maybe
> multi-master with rsync'ing to the other server will work?
Mysql Active-Active replication could do that easily.
AFAIK, mysql backend BIND doesn't have the feature "
Dnia 2011-02-08 16:47 fddi napisał(a):
>I need really something very simple:
>
>
>I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master so I will
>put a mysql instance on each one,
>the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
>
>when one of the servers goes down, the other continue to
/2/8 fddi:
I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql
backend and
seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
You may read this one of the mailing list archive:
https://lists.isc.org
database let;s say 10 entries of
important internet services which must be
always avaliable... that's it nothing complicate.
now I coudl succesfully build my own bind RPM for CentOS with mysql
backend support.
I simply used mysql-bind driver patches
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
now
have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql
backend and
seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
You may read this one of the mailing list archive:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users
considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend and
seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
You may read this one of the mailing list archive:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2008-April
2011/2/8 fddi :
> I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend and
> seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
> At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
>
> http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
>
You may read this one of the mailing l
I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend
and seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
do you think ti si a good alternative only for mysql backend propouses ?
thank you
fddi writes:
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts and I
have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using mysql as
backend ?
Any kind of documentation on this ?
Try google with "bind dlz".
enabl
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts and
I have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using mysql
as backend ?
Any kind of documentation on this ?
thank you
Riccardo
_
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:00 AM, fddi wrote:
Hello,
is anyone using a mysql backend for bind9 ?
how to setup it ?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mysql+backend+for+bind9
thanks
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
Hello,
is anyone using a mysql backend for bind9 ?
how to setup it ?
thanks
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I am NOT looking for one that automagically updates the various files.
I am more than happy with one that builds the files, even including
includes for 'non-supported types' (eg I am working with the HIP DNS
records).
I suppose I could design something, but then I would miss a lot.
I did fin
32 matches
Mail list logo
