On 2/5/2010 5:41 PM, fddi wrote:
Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
instead of the classical master slave model.
First of all, in technical terms, both masters and slaves are considered
"authoritative
Gordon A. Lang wrote:
> Did I recently hear correctly that some future version of BIND will
> be supporting multi-master?
That is in the plans.
> I know slaves can forward updates to masters, but can masters also
> forward updates to other masters? (I can look this up, but I'm
> fishing for oth
Steinar Haug wrote:
> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one
> domain,
> instead of the classical master slave model.
Simple thing to do. I have a test lab here that I did this in a few
years
ago. 2 mas
> > Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> > to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
> > instead of the classical master slave model.
>
> Simple thing to do. I have a test lab here that I did this in a few years
> ago. 2 masters and 4 slav
On Friday 05 February 2010 23:06, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Everyone who isn't a BIND expert and who touches a BIND nameserver should
> own a copy: -)
Could not agree with you more on this point.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
f Barry Margolin
>Sent: 2010, February, 05 9:57 PM
>To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
>Subject: Re: multi master primary nameserver.
>
>In article ,
> fddi wrote:
>
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>> > On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
>> >
>> >&g
On Friday 05 February 2010 17:41, fddi wrote:
> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
> instead of the classical master slave model.
Simple thing to do. I have a test lab here that I did this in a fe
@isc.org
Subject: Re: multi master primary nameserver.
In article ,
fddi wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
> >
> >> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way to have 2
> >> or more multi master name servers authori
In article ,
fddi wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
> >
> >> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> >> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
> >> instead of the classical master slave model.
> >>
> >
>
Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
instead of the classical master slave model.
Yes.
so should I use somthing like rsync or cfengine ?
On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
> instead of the classical master slave model.
Yes.
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
instead of the classical master slave model.
thank you
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://
12 matches
Mail list logo
