Re: FW: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-20 Thread Steven Carr
On 20 December 2013 14:18, houguanghua wrote: > This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision. > Please refer following site: > http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html Looks like it is potentially a "bug"

FW: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-20 Thread houguanghua
This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision. Please refer following site: http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html From: houguang...@hotmail.com To: sjc...@gmail.com CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: mi

RE: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-19 Thread houguanghua
7;ns1.ctyun.cn.', 0); # A record INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view) VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'ns1', 'A', '124.126.253.202','SOA'); INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view) VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'ns2', 

Re: Re: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-19 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <31fecd06-03b0-4efa-a6d8-91e6c2242...@ucd.ie>, "Niall O'Reilly" writ es: > > On 18 Dec 2013, at 15:19, houguanghua wrote: > > > Is there any way to enable the Additional Section? Thanks. > > The server sends data in the additional section if either > (a) these data are r

Re: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-19 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 18 Dec 2013, at 15:19, houguanghua wrote: > Is there any way to enable the Additional Section? Thanks. The server sends data in the additional section if either (a) these data are required, or (b) the server supports and is configured to send data which, although not

RE: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-18 Thread houguanghua
I'm soory. not DLG, but DLZ. > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 03:07:44 + > Subject: Re: missing ‘additional section’ > From: sjc...@gmail.com > To: houguang...@hotmail.com > CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org > > On 19 December 2013 00:48, houguanghua wrote: > > If DLG

Re: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-18 Thread Steven Carr
On 19 December 2013 00:48, houguanghua wrote: > If DLG isn't enabled (bind9+view + zone file , no DB is used), the > additional section is right. Maybe it's a bug of Bind DLG. What is DLG? > What I wanted is as follows : > $ dig @10.3.103.177 www.ctyun.cn > ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R10-P1 <<>> @10.3.

RE: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-18 Thread houguanghua
AL SECTION: ns1.ctyun.cn. 3600IN A 211.16.106.251 ns2.ctyun.cn. 3600IN A 211.16.106.252 ;; Query time: 137 msec ;; SERVER: 10.3.103.177#53(10.3.103.177) ;; WHEN: Thu Dec 19 08:43:58 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 130 > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:09:56

Re: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-18 Thread Steven Carr
On 18 December 2013 15:19, houguanghua wrote: > > When I do a DIG, ‘additional section’ isn’t in the response. My bind > environment is: bind 9.8.6P1 + mysql (OS: Centos). > > Is there any way to enable the Additional Section? Thanks. > What are you expecting to see in the additional section? Yo

missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-18 Thread houguanghua
Dear all, When I do a DIG, ‘additional section’ isn’t in the response. My bind environment is: bind 9.8.6P1 + mysql (OS: Centos).Is there any way to enable the Additional Section? Thanks. $dig @10.3.103.178 www.ctdns.cn ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R10-P1 <<>> @10.3.103.178 www.ctdns.cn; (1 server