Re: in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-21 Thread Lars Hecking
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: [...] > IMHO, you need to go back to the drawing board and, before writing > named.conf and zone files, deciding on a general architecture. > > Who will be the master for 30.172.in-addr.arpa? > Who will be authoritative for 30.172.in-addr.arpa? > Who will be the master

Re: in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-20 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jan 20, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:14:01PM +, Lars Hecking wrote a message of 87 lines which said: Do I need to delegate all 255 /24 subnets explicitly at the top level server? All those you use, yes. Alternatively, make your "root" server

Re: in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-20 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:14:01PM +, Lars Hecking wrote a message of 87 lines which said: > This host is set up as a master for 172.30/16. It delegates 172.30 > to a subdomain (A record for ns1.sub.domain.com is present > elsewhere). Hold on! There is already a contradiction. It is su

in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-20 Thread Lars Hecking
I've been beating my head against the wall with this issue, and I'm out of ideas: I can't get reverse lookups for a particular, delegated RFC1918 net to work. Setup: Internal root dns.domain.com running bind 9.4.2-P2. This host is set up as a master for 172.30/16. It delegates 172.30 to a