Re: different TTLs for multiple TXT records

2020-09-26 Thread Verne Britton
Thank you to Mark Andrews and Matus Uhlar for your quick responses ... I see now how my thought process is fundamentally flawed :-) Sorry for the silly question !! Verne Verne Britton, Lead Systems Programmer voice: (30

Re: different TTLs for multiple TXT records

2020-09-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.09.20 09:58, Verne Britton wrote: I see that RFC2181, written I think 20+ years ago, says in part 5.2. TTLs of RRs in an RRSet Resource Records also have a time to live (TTL). It is possible for the RRs in an RRSet to have different TTLs. No uses for this have been found that cann

Re: different TTLs for multiple TXT records

2020-09-26 Thread Mark Andrews
It won’t happen and there is zero point in doing so as all RRs in a RRset are deleted at the same time. -- Mark Andrews > On 26 Sep 2020, at 23:59, Verne Britton wrote: > > I see that RFC2181, written I think 20+ years ago, says in part > > >> >> 5.2. TTLs of RRs in an RRSet >> >> Resou

different TTLs for multiple TXT records

2020-09-26 Thread Verne Britton
I see that RFC2181, written I think 20+ years ago, says in part 5.2. TTLs of RRs in an RRSet Resource Records also have a time to live (TTL). It is possible for the RRs in an RRSet to have different TTLs. No uses for this have been found that cannot be better accomplished in other way